But they used the 2013 car, so that's not representative at all. I have read on Autosport Plus Mercedes started working on their 2014 project in 2008 (!), developing the KERS/ERS system.Shrieker wrote:How much do you guys think this car's speed comes from the secret tire test performed this time last year ? At the time they said they were testing tires for 2014.
None at all, given that they missed a test that was longer, and where they could actually dictate what was going on, and record data, for having done what the FIA asked them to do.Shrieker wrote:How much do you guys think this car's speed comes from the secret tire test performed this time last year ? At the time they said they were testing tires for 2014.
That isn't correct. The current rules were only finalised at the start of 2011, meaning a maximum of 3 years development. The KERS was being developed for the 2009 season back when they were still Honda, not ERS as the rules for ERS hadn't been written back then.MercedesAMGSpy wrote:But they used the 2013 car, so that's not representative at all. I have read on Autosport Plus Mercedes started working on their 2014 project in 2008 (!), developing the KERS/ERS system.Shrieker wrote:How much do you guys think this car's speed comes from the secret tire test performed this time last year ? At the time they said they were testing tires for 2014.
JDC123 wrote:That isn't correct. The current rules were only finalised at the start of 2011, meaning a maximum of 3 years development. The KERS was being developed for the 2009 season back when they were still Honda, not ERS as the rules for ERS hadn't been written back then.MercedesAMGSpy wrote:But they used the 2013 car, so that's not representative at all. I have read on Autosport Plus Mercedes started working on their 2014 project in 2008 (!), developing the KERS/ERS system.Shrieker wrote:How much do you guys think this car's speed comes from the secret tire test performed this time last year ? At the time they said they were testing tires for 2014.
I think it's a combination of all sorts of things:flyboy2160 wrote:I'm sure to get flamed for this, but in a recent hangover I posited a completely different hypothesis about the recent flattened sidepod extensions that also serve as body exhausts: could they be not for their exhaust properties, but rather for reducing sidepod lift? They sure look like they flatten the sidepod mean camber line.
I'm dubious about the exhaust effect. Even if the Meredith effect could be arranged, how would you be any better off than if you just tried to get as good quality air as possible to the upper edge of the diffuser?
I have a very good CFD program at home, but I don't have a car model and I'm busy with aircraft runs. Do any of you CFD guys with car models want to run this and check the sidepod lift?
And, yes, I'm expecting a rash of suggestions to drink better quality booze....
Which is why I always liked the Red Bull cannon body exhaust. It looked like they tried to keep that crappy air away from the top of the diffuser and put it in some No Man's land between the diffuser top edge and the upper wing. It perhaps means worse air for a center area, bit I can see their overall reasoning.turbof1 wrote:... It's messy air you actually don't want to have anywhere around, but since it has to be there you look for the best place to put them.