Mercedes AMG F1 W05

A place to discuss the characteristics of the cars in Formula One, both current as well as historical. Laptimes, driver worshipping and team chatter do not belong here.
Richard
Richard
Moderator
Joined: 15 Apr 2009, 14:41
Location: UK

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W05

Post

I've moved posts about making the exhausts louder into the dedicated thread so this one can focus on the real W05 thread without distraction of a mickey mouse trumpet. :arrow: http://www.f1technical.net/forum/viewto ... 14#p511614

User avatar
cirrusflyer
5
Joined: 18 Feb 2011, 19:17

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W05

Post

Could be, but I don't think so, because the exhaust is not routed over there..[/quote]
The exhaust is not the only hot thing in the car. The entire purpose of the side pods is to cool things down. If they weren't hot, they wouldn't exist.[/quote]
Agreed.
But what about the rear wing. Why there is no trace in the middle of it?
If flying were the language of man, soaring would be its poetry.
It's all about technology!
When you go fast, do not hesitate to go faster!

Aaronque
Aaronque
34
Joined: 15 Oct 2013, 12:42

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W05

Post

ImageImageImageImageImage

User avatar
Shrieker
13
Joined: 01 Mar 2010, 23:41

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W05

Post

How much do you guys think this car's speed comes from the secret tire test performed this time last year ? At the time they said they were testing tires for 2014.
Education is that which allows a nation free, independent, reputable life, and function as a high society; or it condemns it to captivity and poverty.
-Atatürk

User avatar
MercedesAMGSpy
0
Joined: 18 Apr 2014, 17:39

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W05

Post

Shrieker wrote:How much do you guys think this car's speed comes from the secret tire test performed this time last year ? At the time they said they were testing tires for 2014.
But they used the 2013 car, so that's not representative at all. I have read on Autosport Plus Mercedes started working on their 2014 project in 2008 (!), developing the KERS/ERS system.

megasyxx
megasyxx
-3
Joined: 24 Oct 2010, 21:40

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W05

Post

Wow! 6 years in the making....no wonder they're leaps and bounds vs all the others, tsk tsk =D>

beelsebob
beelsebob
85
Joined: 23 Mar 2011, 15:49
Location: Cupertino, California

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W05

Post

Shrieker wrote:How much do you guys think this car's speed comes from the secret tire test performed this time last year ? At the time they said they were testing tires for 2014.
None at all, given that they missed a test that was longer, and where they could actually dictate what was going on, and record data, for having done what the FIA asked them to do.

JDC123
JDC123
30
Joined: 20 Jun 2013, 21:02

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W05

Post

MercedesAMGSpy wrote:
Shrieker wrote:How much do you guys think this car's speed comes from the secret tire test performed this time last year ? At the time they said they were testing tires for 2014.
But they used the 2013 car, so that's not representative at all. I have read on Autosport Plus Mercedes started working on their 2014 project in 2008 (!), developing the KERS/ERS system.
That isn't correct. The current rules were only finalised at the start of 2011, meaning a maximum of 3 years development. The KERS was being developed for the 2009 season back when they were still Honda, not ERS as the rules for ERS hadn't been written back then.

user001
user001
-2
Joined: 29 Sep 2012, 15:55

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W05

Post

Yes, they were working on the ERS from 2008 on. It was said, that they simply did not stop with further development after the KERS was sacked. I doubt it was intended ever since to come back as a works team.

brawn was quoted one time that the actual development of the car had started roundabout the end of 2011/2012.

but yes, they've kept the pot boiling far off and before the overs.

ferrari started at least in 2012 as much as lotus.

Crucial_Xtreme
Crucial_Xtreme
404
Joined: 16 Oct 2011, 00:13
Location: Charlotte

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W05

Post

GA's analysis of Merc's new FW vane

Image
via AutoSport

mantikos
mantikos
35
Joined: 02 Mar 2011, 17:35

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W05

Post

JDC123 wrote:
MercedesAMGSpy wrote:
Shrieker wrote:How much do you guys think this car's speed comes from the secret tire test performed this time last year ? At the time they said they were testing tires for 2014.
But they used the 2013 car, so that's not representative at all. I have read on Autosport Plus Mercedes started working on their 2014 project in 2008 (!), developing the KERS/ERS system.
That isn't correct. The current rules were only finalised at the start of 2011, meaning a maximum of 3 years development. The KERS was being developed for the 2009 season back when they were still Honda, not ERS as the rules for ERS hadn't been written back then.

The ERS was being developed by Mercedes Engine - not the team specifically. Please read the previous few pages.

flyboy2160
flyboy2160
84
Joined: 25 Apr 2011, 17:05

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W05

Post

I'm sure to get flamed for this, but in a recent hangover I posited a completely different hypothesis about the recent flattened sidepod extensions that also serve as body exhausts: could they be not for their exhaust properties, but rather for reducing sidepod lift? They sure look like they flatten the sidepod mean camber line.

I'm dubious about the exhaust effect. Even if the Meredith effect could be arranged, how would you be any better off than if you just tried to get as good quality air as possible to the upper edge of the diffuser?

I have a very good CFD program at home, but I don't have a car model and I'm busy with aircraft runs. Do any of you CFD guys with car models want to run this and check the sidepod lift?

And, yes, I'm expecting a rash of suggestions to drink better quality booze....

User avatar
turbof1
Moderator
Joined: 19 Jul 2012, 21:36
Location: MountDoom CFD Matrix

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W05

Post

flyboy2160 wrote:I'm sure to get flamed for this, but in a recent hangover I posited a completely different hypothesis about the recent flattened sidepod extensions that also serve as body exhausts: could they be not for their exhaust properties, but rather for reducing sidepod lift? They sure look like they flatten the sidepod mean camber line.

I'm dubious about the exhaust effect. Even if the Meredith effect could be arranged, how would you be any better off than if you just tried to get as good quality air as possible to the upper edge of the diffuser?

I have a very good CFD program at home, but I don't have a car model and I'm busy with aircraft runs. Do any of you CFD guys with car models want to run this and check the sidepod lift?

And, yes, I'm expecting a rash of suggestions to drink better quality booze....
I think it's a combination of all sorts of things:
-Obviously the sidepods are less sloped then last year. Last year they had the issue of having an exhaust placed by regs in a very specific space. In order to get a good downwash effect, the sidepods had to be sloped, a necessary evil since it brings alot of lift and even drag. This year is a bit different: they still want to keep the undercute, but they don't to have the sidepods that sloped anymore.

-I don't believe in the meredith effect or even exhaust-like effect: Exhaust gasses is a high energy, low pressure flow. Air coming out of the cooling outlets, which are claimed to be exhaust replacers, is the exact opposite (with the exception of the temperature). It's messy air you actually don't want to have anywhere around, but since it has to be there you look for the best place to put them.
#AeroFrodo

flyboy2160
flyboy2160
84
Joined: 25 Apr 2011, 17:05

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W05

Post

turbof1 wrote:... It's messy air you actually don't want to have anywhere around, but since it has to be there you look for the best place to put them.
Which is why I always liked the Red Bull cannon body exhaust. It looked like they tried to keep that crappy air away from the top of the diffuser and put it in some No Man's land between the diffuser top edge and the upper wing. It perhaps means worse air for a center area, bit I can see their overall reasoning.

User avatar
SiLo
138
Joined: 25 Jul 2010, 19:09

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W05

Post

I think the same thing, they just want to exit this slower, messy air in a place where it will have minimal effect on downforce producing areas. Around the suspension is clearly the best place to do this, especially this year with the beam wing gone. Keep it high enough to have minimal effect on the diffuser, and low enough to not interfere with the underside of the rear wing.
Felipe Baby!