2012 Testing - Jerez 7-10 February

Post here all non technical related topics about Formula One. This includes race results, discussions, testing analysis etc. TV coverage and other personal questions should be in Off topic chat.
Mr.S
Mr.S
0
Joined: 09 Apr 2011, 18:21

Re: Jerez pre season testing 7/8/9/10 February

Post

Webber's top speed crosses the 300 km/h mark.

User avatar
raymondu999
54
Joined: 04 Feb 2010, 07:31

Re: Jerez pre season testing 7/8/9/10 February

Post

Where do you get speed trap data from?
失败者找理由,成功者找方法

User avatar
Donuts
1
Joined: 01 Jun 2010, 18:28

Re: Jerez pre season testing 7/8/9/10 February

Post

raymondu999 wrote:Where do you get speed trap data from?
Autosport

15:29 And though Webber only clocked a 1m28.0s next time, his speed in sector one topped 300 km/h - the fastest seen all day. Unexplored potential?
The speed of Ayrton Senna.
The mind of Alain Prost.
The dedication of Michael Schumacher.
The determination of Alex Zanardi.

User avatar
raymondu999
54
Joined: 04 Feb 2010, 07:31

Re: Jerez pre season testing 7/8/9/10 February

Post

Someone said in another thread that the Red Bull has rubbish turn in stability. While I don't believe it (come on - this is probably the most stable car of the last 2.5 years) it would certainly explain it.
失败者找理由,成功者找方法

User avatar
dren
226
Joined: 03 Mar 2010, 14:14

Re: Jerez pre season testing 7/8/9/10 February

Post

They did lose the EBD which likely gave the car a lot of turn in stability. But it was good in 09 though. No explination there.
Honda!

User avatar
raymondu999
54
Joined: 04 Feb 2010, 07:31

Re: Jerez pre season testing 7/8/9/10 February

Post

EBD would just give them more rear downforce period. You could still crank up the rear wing and get the downforce back. I don't think the EBD will change anything in terms of the handling characteristics of the car - it will just shift the setup window.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S0QqXZtiZUY[/youtube]
失败者找理由,成功者找方法

User avatar
dren
226
Joined: 03 Mar 2010, 14:14

Re: Jerez pre season testing 7/8/9/10 February

Post

raymondu999 wrote:EBD would just give them more rear downforce period. You could still crank up the rear wing and get the downforce back. I don't think the EBD will change anything in terms of the handling characteristics of the car - it will just shift the setup window.
I figured it did help under braking with the off throttle maps.

Maybe Webber just needs to adjust his driving style. I find it hard to believe that the Red Bull would all of a sudden be skiddish into the corners, like you stated earlier. Maybe they are having flow separation issues with the floor if they are still trying to run too high of a rake? I know Newey stated they had to lower the rear, but maybe it wasn't lowered enough yet? Just some guessing.
Honda!

User avatar
raymondu999
54
Joined: 04 Feb 2010, 07:31

Re: Jerez pre season testing 7/8/9/10 February

Post

dren wrote:
raymondu999 wrote:EBD would just give them more rear downforce period. You could still crank up the rear wing and get the downforce back. I don't think the EBD will change anything in terms of the handling characteristics of the car - it will just shift the setup window.
I figured it did help under braking with the off throttle maps.

Maybe Webber just needs to adjust his driving style. I find it hard to believe that the Red Bull would all of a sudden be skiddish into the corners, like you stated earlier. Maybe they are having flow separation issues with the floor if they are still trying to run too high of a rake? I know Newey stated they had to lower the rear, but maybe it wasn't lowered enough yet? Just some guessing.
Possibly. Again though - about helping with the brakes. That's because they had more downforce. The brakes didn't become better because of the exhausts - that's a function of the extra downforce afforded. If you get where I'm going with the differentiation. Again, I don't think the EBD could intrinsically change the handling/balance in a way that can't be countered - it just moved the setup window.
失败者找理由,成功者找方法

Mr.S
Mr.S
0
Joined: 09 Apr 2011, 18:21

Re: Jerez pre season testing 7/8/9/10 February

Post

MSC had good consistent laps all ranging from 1-22's to 1-23's. Source - Williams Site.

What modifications did Mercedes run of the W02??? I mean no EBD right?? Periscope exhausts??

User avatar
JohnsonsEvilTwin
0
Joined: 29 Jan 2010, 11:51
Location: SU 419113

Re: Jerez pre season testing 7/8/9/10 February

Post

Ebd will have a big difference in handling terms.

It was a massive gain of around 15-20 % downforce. Red Bull had the rake which allowed a FW running close to the ground.
Every millimetre that wing ran closer to the ground was performance gained on its rivals.
The ban on ebd means they cannot run super rake adjusted set ups, they cannot have the leading edge of their wing skimming the floor, and they cannot utilise the their own ebd blown concept(as the inventors of the system, I'm going to say they had the best one out there).

That's not to say the RB8 is screwed, becuase the previous 2 cars were more than just ebd wagons. But to say the loss of ebd just means a shift in the set up window is wrong.
Losing 15-20 points downforce is akin to a disaster beyond setup windows...
More could have been done.
David Purley

Mr.S
Mr.S
0
Joined: 09 Apr 2011, 18:21

Re: Jerez pre season testing 7/8/9/10 February

Post

raymondu999 wrote:
dren wrote:
raymondu999 wrote:EBD would just give them more rear downforce period. You could still crank up the rear wing and get the downforce back. I don't think the EBD will change anything in terms of the handling characteristics of the car - it will just shift the setup window.
I figured it did help under braking with the off throttle maps.

Maybe Webber just needs to adjust his driving style. I find it hard to believe that the Red Bull would all of a sudden be skiddish into the corners, like you stated earlier. Maybe they are having flow separation issues with the floor if they are still trying to run too high of a rake? I know Newey stated they had to lower the rear, but maybe it wasn't lowered enough yet? Just some guessing.
Possibly. Again though - about helping with the brakes. That's because they had more downforce. The brakes didn't become better because of the exhausts - that's a function of the extra downforce afforded. If you get where I'm going with the differentiation. Again, I don't think the EBD could intrinsically change the handling/balance in a way that can't be countered - it just moved the setup window.

It would,breaking points would alter, with less downforce the car in general tends to slide. The whole car handling changes. The rear hide & rake changes to. EBD allows people to run a higher rake.

User avatar
dren
226
Joined: 03 Mar 2010, 14:14

Re: Jerez pre season testing 7/8/9/10 February

Post

It looked like the W02 was the exact same on the outside from what they finished the season with.
Honda!

Mr.S
Mr.S
0
Joined: 09 Apr 2011, 18:21

Re: Jerez pre season testing 7/8/9/10 February

Post

Dren no exhaust modification?? They ran with the EBD???

stefan_
stefan_
696
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 12:43
Location: Bucharest, Romania

Re: Jerez pre season testing 7/8/9/10 February

Post

Image
"...and there, very much in flames, is Jacques Laffite's Ligier. That's obviously a turbo blaze, and of course, Laffite will be able to see that conflagration in his mirrors... he is coolly parking the car somewhere safe." Murray Walker, San Marino 1985

User avatar
raymondu999
54
Joined: 04 Feb 2010, 07:31

Re: Jerez pre season testing 7/8/9/10 February

Post

JohnsonsEvilTwin wrote:Ebd will have a big difference in handling terms.

It was a massive gain of around 15-20 % downforce. Red Bull had the rake which allowed a FW running close to the ground.
Every millimetre that wing ran closer to the ground was performance gained on its rivals.
The ban on ebd means they cannot run super rake adjusted set ups, they cannot have the leading edge of their wing skimming the floor, and they cannot utilise the their own ebd blown concept(as the inventors of the system, I'm going to say they had the best one out there).

That's not to say the RB8 is screwed, becuase the previous 2 cars were more than just ebd wagons. But to say the loss of ebd just means a shift in the set up window is wrong.
Losing 15-20 points downforce is akin to a disaster beyond setup windows...
Mr.S wrote:It would,breaking points would alter, with less downforce the car in general tends to slide. The whole car handling changes. The rear hide & rake changes to. EBD allows people to run a higher rake.
So in what way would you propose that the cars, sans EBD, could be affected, to the point that you couldn't compensate with setup changes? Will the cars be slower? Yes. Will they have less downforce at the back, or overall? Yes. But will it change the balance (to eliminate any possible misunderstanding - what I'm terming as balance here is the balance of grip from back to front, responsiveness, stability, under/oversteer)? I doubt it. You would still be able to achieve the same balance; albeit slower, sans EBD.

Braking distances would be longer, and you'd have a longer time before you could get out of the "traction limited" zone out of slower corners. But I don't think the handling balance of the car would change.
dren wrote:It looked like the W02 was the exact same on the outside from what they finished the season with.
I was about to ask the same question as S did.
失败者找理由,成功者找方法