Intake Valve and Feliks' ideas

[Feliks]

http://www.pilotfriend.com/training/fli ... g/gyro.htm

http://www.freepatentsonline.com/1982636.pdf

Andrew

[Ciro Pabón]

Excuse me if I'm wrong, but this time I think no.

Isn't the ventjet engine a ramjet engine inside another ramjet engine?

I mean, a ramjet engine works through Bernoulli.

The throats of the ramjets are carefully balanced against all its flying conditions, so if you put it inside another venturi what you are proposing is a larger ramjet that should be modified to fit the "outer" venturi proposed.

Either that is true or I'm lost.

As a KERS you're not recovering energy losses, you're creating new ones, so I don't think so.

I mean, for every watt you get from the air, you lose more than one watt (I'd guess around 2 watts) to drag.

These two watts, this energy dissipated in the wind, doesn't comes from recovered heat or inertial (braking) energy, but from the main engine, which in turn has its OWN losses of 60 percent or so.

So, for every watt you get from this kind of KERS you would be wasting around 4 watts of gasoline (two to air and another two to engine heat), give or take.

[xpensive]

Excuse me if I'm wrong, but this time I think no.
...

Not wrong at all Ciro, when I saw the above post the other day I was certain it was a prank, why I didn't bother.

Just as smart as mounting a turbine on the nose of the car, driving a generator to recover air resistance losses.

[Feliks]

Another animation:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tz2rQvCxp44

Regards Andrew

[Feliks]

Originally posted by monkeysandbearspants
Having digested the content of the thread i conclude that the answer could be one of these !!

However weight may be an issue and mostly certainly there would need to to be some boot modifications!

http://www.full-ahead.net/Silownia/siln ... ex_ang.htm

http://www.full-ahead.net/Silownia/siln ... _zawor.htm

http://www.full-ahead.net/Silownia/siln ... ex_ang.htm

double bottom fo foam
http://www.youtube.com/user/pawielus?gl ... fp0BWKwdgY dno


large swimmer:
http://www.youtube.com/user/pawielus?gl ... nxWu3oWghs

Regards Andrew

[Feliks]

[quote name='Feliks' post='5125841' date='Jun 24 2011, 15:36']I thought about that. The float on the animation gives the impression of a small..[/quote]

I think that this would be accurate...

http://www.dieselduck.net/videos/04%20w ... 20seas.wmv


I wonder how many tons of water would be able to pump out the 100-meter high tank, during one cycle of the wave?

Regards Andrew

[Feliks]

The Red Baron Windmill:

Due to the vacuum created by the wing, over which the wind flows, wind turbines in the channels of collective spin vacuum and provide energy....



Here you can see demonstrations of the film that created a vacuum at the top of the wing when the wind blows on him.
The resulting vacuum can suck the ball into the pipe passing through the wing.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fb8IFfnbjY8

By placing many of the holes on the top of the wing, use the vacuum on the entire surface of the wing. The Assembly shall meet in two sustaining supports and drives the suction fans to them with normal air pressure.
This will of course be used to produce energy,
and its amount will depend on the size of the system...

Regards Andrew

[Feliks]

Well, some developing:

Of course, you must use the entire art of loving wing aerodynamics.
And How companies grow one way: speed amplifier in the form of air intake venturi nozzle.




Well, and a new kind of wings...
Venturi nozzle flat... After all the two wings made contrary to each other..




Regards Andrew

[Feliks]

In other forum :
[quote name='gruntguru' date='Jul 6 2011, 08:37' post='5147823']
Those wings need endplates.

Seriously - using the flow in a secondary device means that a lot of the wind power is wasted, because the mass flow through the turbines is much less than the wind mass flow captured by the machine.

I have seen some interesting and original ideas in this thread, but you are wasting YOUR energy trying to improve on the efficiency of a modern wind turbine.
[/quote]

All of this, I waste my energy ,you able to understand that there are other, much more efficient ways of using wind energy.

I know your great love for modern wind turbine, but you must remember that any excessive love sent your eyes, and impossible for an objective view of reality.

Besides, is not just about the same efficiency, but also for it to be able to build a very simple structure that even the next 4,000 years will exist. I makes sense to build on the sea, because they almost always wind blows from one direction - from the sea. And so it will probably still over the next 4000 years...
  In such a structure may be, for example, 100 such horizontal " flat venturi " and long for 300 meters. Constructed channels will lead to negative pressure turbines which generate much electricity. And the only element consuming to be turbine generators. The rest should survive 4000 years without repairs...

So with these issues will be decisive, not only we can improve the efficiency of Venturi amplifier.

Well unless the people have lost the ability to build such structures ...



And here in a better resolution though you wanted to see more details:

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/c ... ramids.jpg

But who will be Pharaoh??

Regards Andrew

[Feliks]

And here's the picture of Homer family watching the Red Baron Windmill prototype with flat Venturi nozzles.
If you meet all expectations, this is a prototype of Homer performs with Stone, as Pharaoh himself had wished.
And it will be a very durable building, well, for example, compared to the ridiculously short life of nuclear reactors...





Best Regards Andrew

[Ciro Pabón]

... I makes sense to build on the sea, because they almost always wind blows from one direction - from the sea.

The wind blows from the sea by day.

During the night, it blows towards the sea.

[Formula None]

Keep posting your ideas, Feliks, I enjoy reading them. I like the idea of benign, stable, multi-generation, "low-tech", low maintenance, low impact, diffuse, low intensity energy sources. Nuclear being the opposite of all these things (complex & requiring the humans involved to not make mistakes). Very sci fi. Or Indiana Jones, happening upon ancient functional booby traps.

It would be a nice gift to future generations, to have ruins that could be relatively easily revived for power production, should our civilization end up nuking ourselves, get fried by a solar flare or run out of adequate food & power sources (although most of humanity is already experiencing the latter). Existing dams may be an example of something like this. Stone venturis of some sort, as you mention, are an interesting idea. Maybe some sort of geothermal steam production, fed by rain or tides? The most timeless artifacts that our civilization has to show for itself currently is its waste (nuclear, ~100k year half life) &, on a lighter note, space probes.

*Benny Goodman clip*

Just how old are you, anyway?

[Feliks]

... I makes sense to build on the sea, because they almost always wind blows from one direction - from the sea.

The wind blows from the sea by day.

During the night, it blows towards the sea.

We need a current in the day. At night, electricity is much cheaper...

Andrew

[Feliks]

[quote name='gruntguru' post='5167127' date='Jul 12 2011, 06:36']With a dash of fantasy.[/quote]

Oh yes, a little bit of you have, then a little knowledge and work reliably over the idea and new invention ready.....

Here you can see perfectly that we can get plenty of potential energy generated by the aerodynamics, without any propellers....
It allows a range of up to 3000 km by glider...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gliding


Andrew

[Feliks]

In other forum
[QUOTE=Henning;751595]Oh yes, a little bit of you have, then a little knowledge and work reliably over the idea and new invention ready.....

Here you can see perfectly that we can get plenty of potential energy generated by the aerodynamics, without any propellers....
It allows a range of up to 3000 km by glider...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gliding


Andrew:stir:[/quote]

The main energies supplied to a glider is gravity and convection(solar) energy. Even a glider has to be able to change it's vector to operate at a gain. At the end of the day, a glider has produced very little work. If you were to try to power the world on the work performed levels of a glider, it would be a herculean task.[/QUOTE]


You know perfectly well, with new ideas about the rank of the fundamental, very difficult to penetrate to the use of mass...

But thanks to people like you, we can slowly try to..
Another, although not looking as Hekules, we have on video..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fb8IFfnbjY8

Instead, we can build an automatic flow of balls so that they can be sucked into the pipe.
A falling ball (or WATER) with wings, they can hit their way back after a shoulder wheel, similar to a water wheel, giving him his potential energy ..

Well, the automatic circuit, will cause the "Hercules" he can rest.
This is just an example of how we can use another way of generating energy this way.

Regards Andrew