Mr Alcatraz wrote:I don't have a problem with Hemingway; however being a student of letters when I matriculated I learned how much of an a-hole he really was. I wasn't making light of his daughter offing herself. I was suggesting he had an influence on her that contributed. The laughing emoticon was in bad taste, you got me there. I just don't think he is in any way making a valid point. Bullfighting isn't a sport, its torture. Why not include dueling with hand guns, and swords? That is significantly more equitable than butchering a Bull. How about Rodeo, specifically Bull riding and to a lesser degree unbroken horses? What about boxing, or even wrestling? I'm sure there are others that have slipped my mind at the moment. I really don't think much of that quote. If you read as much about him as I have you would know what an egotistical jerk he was with plenty of examples that back up my assertions. He really did not have any sense of fair play,
and was in no way an authority on what constitutes sport!
I know a lot of people like that quote. I happen to be one that finds it profoundly flawed.
That's all
![Wink :wink:](./images/smilies/icon_e_wink.gif)
Hmm interesting, here we have a man that tells Hemingway he he had no authority to decide what was a sport and what wasn´t.
Yet this person says:
Mr Alcatraz wrote:Bullfighting isn't a sport, its torture.
Wonderful piece of logic there mate. If Spain considered bull fighting a sport back then, then it was a sport.
We call throwing a circular piece of rock across a slippery surface while two people brushing in front of it a sport.
Trying not to get killed by a bull on a consistent basis i would call a sport.
This sport i agree is torture but you just as Hemingway do not decide what is a sport and what isn´t.