Williams FW32 Cosworth

A place to discuss the characteristics of the cars in Formula One, both current as well as historical. Laptimes, driver worshipping and team chatter do not belong here.
tomazy
tomazy
208
Joined: 10 Jan 2006, 13:01

Re: Williams Cosworth FW32

Post

horse wrote:It's weird that picture, which day was that photo taken? I can't find a similar picture. There is this one:

Image
tomazy wrote:I found one particulary interesting picture from Jerez testing. The rear wing on this picture has a white stip acros, and what looks like a gap in the middle of that strip? This is strange, becouse 3 part rear wings aren't legal?

What do you guys think?

http://img37.imageshack.us/img37/5568/djm1020fe82.jpg
Regarding the big picture, it looks more like a long main element with a white strip, followed by a short second element. My feeling is, that if you could see daylight through it then it couldn't be a blown flap. I think you can definitely see daylight through the small, high, slit. Also, note that you can see the normal williams 'slot' in the flap element above the jack man's head. So I'd be surprised if this was a blowing slot in addition to the normal slot.

So I reckon, not blown flap but long main element with stripe. High downforce setup perhaps?

EDIT: Although, if you at the end plate it looks like there is light coming through what I thought was a white stripe. However, I reckon this is just a reflection of the white paint rather than light getting through.
Yes, it is strange. It might be a narrow whiter strip on the not so white strip, but if you look closer at the bottom edge of the narrow strip, there is something that seems to be the edge of the wing element. But you are right, if it is day light comeing through it cant be the same principle as BMW or mclaren.

I also didnt come across any other similar pictures

axle
axle
3
Joined: 22 Jun 2004, 14:45
Location: Norfolk, UK

Re: Williams Cosworth FW32

Post

Tomazy,

Scarbs agrees with you;

http://twitter.com/scarbsf1

And gives you the credit for noticing ;)
- Axle

axle
axle
3
Joined: 22 Jun 2004, 14:45
Location: Norfolk, UK

Re: Williams Cosworth FW32

Post

Scarbs has just posted that the FW32 featured sidepod intake restricters at Jerez as they possibly feel that the Cosworth is taking less to cool.

http://scarbsf1.wordpress.com/
- Axle

User avatar
Blackout
1566
Joined: 09 Feb 2010, 04:12

Re: Williams Cosworth FW32

Post

I saw this in the first tests in Jerez.

User avatar
outer_bongolia
5
Joined: 13 Feb 2009, 19:17

Re: Williams Cosworth FW32

Post

tomazy wrote:
horse wrote:It's weird that picture, which day was that photo taken? I can't find a similar picture. There is this one:
tomazy wrote:I found one particulary interesting picture from Jerez testing. The rear wing on this picture has a white stip acros, and what looks like a gap in the middle of that strip? This is strange, becouse 3 part rear wings aren't legal?

What do you guys think?

http://img37.imageshack.us/img37/5568/djm1020fe82.jpg
Regarding the big picture, it looks more like a long main element with a white strip, followed by a short second element. My feeling is, that if you could see daylight through it then it couldn't be a blown flap. I think you can definitely see daylight through the small, high, slit. Also, note that you can see the normal williams 'slot' in the flap element above the jack man's head. So I'd be surprised if this was a blowing slot in addition to the normal slot.

So I reckon, not blown flap but long main element with stripe. High downforce setup perhaps?

EDIT: Although, if you at the end plate it looks like there is light coming through what I thought was a white stripe. However, I reckon this is just a reflection of the white paint rather than light getting through.
Yes, it is strange. It might be a narrow whiter strip on the not so white strip, but if you look closer at the bottom edge of the narrow strip, there is something that seems to be the edge of the wing element. But you are right, if it is day light comeing through it cant be the same principle as BMW or mclaren.

I also didnt come across any other similar pictures
Isn't it the same tool McLaren is using to prevent flow separation in the upper element?
Skeptical scrutiny is the means, in both science and religion, by which deep thoughts can be winnowed from deep nonsense.
Carl Sagan

meves
meves
1
Joined: 22 Oct 2007, 12:01

Re: Williams Cosworth FW32

Post

Scarbs has a photo from today of restricted cooling for the cosworth, it looks like it is cooler than they first thought!

Image

Would anyone know why they have routed more air under the side pods, by blocking the bottom of the air inlet rather than the top or side? Can they better utilise the additonal flow at the back of the car?

User avatar
raceman
0
Joined: 25 Jul 2009, 08:57
Location: Pune, India

Re: Williams Cosworth FW32

Post

meves wrote:Scarbs has a photo from today of restricted cooling for the cosworth, it looks like it is cooler than they first thought!

Image
WOW!

this looks interesting..... is it really?? then why the Lotus was having glowing exhausts at last test and was on fire? maybe not enough cooling arrangement by the team themselves???

axle
axle
3
Joined: 22 Jun 2004, 14:45
Location: Norfolk, UK

Re: Williams Cosworth FW32

Post

They would indeed block off the lower section to force more air around the sidepods to the back of the car. This will reduce drag and potentially improve the performance of the diffuser.

Lotus's issue doesn't have to be engine related directly...the exhausts will glow on all the cars...setting fire to the car could have been an installation issue, small oil leak etc.
- Axle

A13EX_f
A13EX_f
0
Joined: 24 Sep 2009, 13:42

Re: Williams Cosworth FW32

Post

i think the fire was due to a fuel pump issue with the cosworth engine not anything to do with lotus themselves?

tomazy
tomazy
208
Joined: 10 Jan 2006, 13:01

Re: Williams Cosworth FW32

Post

New sidepod inlets for chassis02

new
Image

old
Image

User avatar
horse
6
Joined: 23 Oct 2009, 17:53
Location: Bilbao, ES

Re: Williams Cosworth FW32

Post

tomazy wrote:New sidepod inlets for chassis02
Wow, they've really closed them off. Cosworth runs pretty cold then, I guess. This is backed up by the rear of the car where the slots and openings of the Mercedes or Renault are not so apparent. What does this mean in performance terms? Is a cooler engine more efficient?
"Words are for meaning: when you've got the meaning, you can forget the words." - Chuang Tzu

rich1701
rich1701
8
Joined: 11 Sep 2009, 17:09

Re: Williams Cosworth FW32

Post

horse wrote:
tomazy wrote:New sidepod inlets for chassis02
Wow, they've really closed them off. Cosworth runs pretty cold then, I guess. This is backed up by the rear of the car where the slots and openings of the Mercedes or Renault are not so apparent. What does this mean in performance terms? Is a cooler engine more efficient?
I believe a cooler engine allows slighty more dense fuel/air mixture which carries more oxygen and more fuel to the combustion chamber than a warm mixture would. Thus more power.

User avatar
Blackout
1566
Joined: 09 Feb 2010, 04:12

Re: Williams Cosworth FW32

Post

Yes
And heat is energy. So a cooler engine looses less energy :mrgreen:

King Six
King Six
1
Joined: 27 May 2008, 16:52
Location: London, England

Re: Williams Cosworth FW32

Post

Also less drag if the pods don't need to open so much

User avatar
ringo
230
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 10:57

Re: Williams Cosworth FW32

Post

side pod inlets now resemble Mclaren and Virgin rectangular inlets.
For Sure!!