Odd deal but seems like a major one.a multi-year partnership that will see the Huski Chocolate brand represented on the rear wing
Odd deal but seems like a major one.a multi-year partnership that will see the Huski Chocolate brand represented on the rear wing
In terms of associating an F1 car with a chocolate drink, but it might just be me.mclaren111 wrote: ↑05 Feb 2019, 12:51
What to you mean by "Odd deal" ??
Odd is when you buy a newspaper, only to find out it's missing every other page.... This, I'd call bizarre...
#aerogollumturbof1 wrote: YOU SHALL NOT......STALLLLL!!!
I don't see the major difference between Huski, Red Bull, Rich Energy or Coca-Cola. It's just a drink.Ground Effect wrote: ↑05 Feb 2019, 13:25Odd is when you buy a newspaper, only to find out it's missing every other page.... This, I'd call bizarre...
wtf
Well saidgodlameroso wrote: ↑05 Feb 2019, 17:17Desperate for what, money is money. Racing point is sponsored by fancy tap water. Carlos Sainz is sponsored by non-alcoholic beer. The chocolate drinks company thinks throwing money at McLaren for advertisement will have decent ROI, that's their business. If someone gave you money and product for advertisement real estate, would you decline it just because it's a chocolate drink?
True, like Sensodynegodlameroso wrote: ↑05 Feb 2019, 17:17Desperate for what, money is money. Racing point is sponsored by fancy tap water. Carlos Sainz is sponsored by non-alcoholic beer. The chocolate drinks company thinks throwing money at McLaren for advertisement will have decent ROI, that's their business. If someone gave you money and product for advertisement real estate, would you decline it just because it's a chocolate drink?
ron would decline it. as he did not want the mclaren brand to become watered down to some 'free for all' canvas but maintain a certain 'elitist' aura around it.godlameroso wrote: ↑05 Feb 2019, 17:17Desperate for what, money is money. Racing point is sponsored by fancy tap water. Carlos Sainz is sponsored by non-alcoholic beer. The chocolate drinks company thinks throwing money at McLaren for advertisement will have decent ROI, that's their business. If someone gave you money and product for advertisement real estate, would you decline it just because it's a chocolate drink?
Never heard about the Sony speculation/rumour. How long ago was that?Manoah2u wrote: ↑05 Feb 2019, 18:28ron would decline it. as he did not want the mclaren brand to become watered down to some 'free for all' canvas but maintain a certain 'elitist' aura around it.godlameroso wrote: ↑05 Feb 2019, 17:17Desperate for what, money is money. Racing point is sponsored by fancy tap water. Carlos Sainz is sponsored by non-alcoholic beer. The chocolate drinks company thinks throwing money at McLaren for advertisement will have decent ROI, that's their business. If someone gave you money and product for advertisement real estate, would you decline it just because it's a chocolate drink?
I'm not saying that i agree with Ron, and that time has gone, but i feel this is going the other opposite.
And what Force india does is their business, it doesn't mean Mclaren should do something awkward.
I well remember the time that there was serious speculation about Sony becoming a sponsor and being prominent on the car. Much better imho if that would have been the case. Samsung, Apple, Diesel. stuff like that.