It's always kinda silly when people just leave out all circumstances and possible reasons for the difference in performance, isn't it?Sieper wrote: ↑28 Aug 2021, 17:25Utter bullshit. Every serious fan knows that Russell is a fantastic driver, and they gambled full on a rain set-up. That is why he beat Hamilton (who can’t afford that gamble) and even came close to Max. In the dry tomorrow (which it likely won’t be) he will get eaten alive.Just_a_fan wrote: ↑28 Aug 2021, 17:20Max is only 3 tenths ahead of Russell in a Williams. Not so good really when you consider it's normally 2 seconds in the dry.
Russell made everyone else on the grid look very silly there, including Max.
Merc (probably both) are on a rather low-ish DF setup, at least for those conditions (as said by Lewis in the post quali interview), dunno about Max who also had the potential benefit of being a bit further back on track (RIC getting 4th was indicative for track improvement) - additionally neither WDC contender would risk more than necessary whilst Russell in the (probably wet set up having) Williams could risk it all, which is what Norris tried but overdid.
This obviously doesn't take anything away from his performance, which was one of those great drivers we don't see too often.
However any blanket statements about any driver being good/bad/better/worse are misplaced imho and the race tomorrow will show which set up choice was right or whether anyone really went for a 'full wet' one.