Lycoming wrote:It was obviously not ideal... he won the race in spite of, not because of that strategy, which they decided to switch to after that botched pit stop where they fitted the wrong set of tyres to his car. On top of that, the soft tyre this year is even less durable.
Ehh... if he has a crappy qualifying, maybe.
I disagree. After he lost track position and erroneous strategy, he won BECAUSE of the one-stop. Had he not lost track position, possibly the two stopper would've been a quicker option, and under normal circumstances, if he had done a planned 1-stop, then we can say he won in spite of it. But it was a conscious decision to employ said strategy
Mr Alcatraz wrote:I think that what will determine who does a one stopper is if they really can get 50+ laps on the primes, and 20-28 laps on supersofts in practice without falling off the cliff.
For reference - last year after Thursday most were saying the primes would hold for about 40 laps. Vettel did something like 57, albeit some were safety car assisted.
Of course than there is the prospect of rain which could render this hypothesis useless
I love a good wet race, especially without changing conditions (ie only wets or inters should be seen, with the slicks taking shade) but to be frank, I wish it was dry. The FIA has recently been over gung ho with red flags and safety cars. Canada 2011, Malaysia 2012 come to mind. Malaysia has massive runoffs. Can you imagine how rain-averse they'd be in Monaco!? Canada has walls too, but the braking zones all lead to runoffs, which isn't quite the case in Monaco.