Is F1 getting boring?

Post here all non technical related topics about Formula One. This includes race results, discussions, testing analysis etc. TV coverage and other personal questions should be in Off topic chat.
User avatar
machin
162
Joined: 25 Nov 2008, 14:45

Re: Is F1 getting boring?

Post

I can foresee strategies of waiting to pass at the last opportunity before the race ends. Sort of like bikes.
Or try and break away from the main pack at any point during the race and then try and stay clear... :P

Oooo, I do love road race cycling... especially now they've started to outlaw radios... a very tactical sport, and very interesting from an aerodynamics point of view too.
COMPETITION CAR ENGINEERING -Home of VIRTUAL STOPWATCH

User avatar
machin
162
Joined: 25 Nov 2008, 14:45

Re: Is F1 getting boring?

Post

kilcoo316 wrote: KERS isn't a differentiator once every team has it.
It is if you can only deploy it when you're within 1 second of the car infront.... like my "Virtual slipstreaming" idea.
kilcoo316 wrote:The suggestion earlier in the thread of an extra 1,000 rpm (or whatever) released through the standard ECU when within a second of the car in front is a real differentiator, and something to definitely be considered IMO.
Thanks!
COMPETITION CAR ENGINEERING -Home of VIRTUAL STOPWATCH

Just_a_fan
Just_a_fan
593
Joined: 31 Jan 2010, 20:37

Re: Is F1 getting boring?

Post

kilcoo316 wrote:
machin wrote: I think they've just got to bite the bullet and create another performance differentiator that doesn't reply on aero to allow more over-taking. Personally I think the engine/transmission/KERS system needs to provide this diffenertiator....
KERS isn't a differentiator once every team has it

Part of of the tactical game will be trying to get the other guy to use his KERS at an inopportune moment so that you can use yours later in the lap to good effect. Of course, that would need tracks with more than 1 overtaking option available to the drivers...
If you are more fortunate than others, build a larger table not a taller fence.

User avatar
flynfrog
Moderator
Joined: 23 Mar 2006, 22:31

Re: Is F1 getting boring?

Post

why not grease the track look at rain races. lots of overtaking.

Just_a_fan
Just_a_fan
593
Joined: 31 Jan 2010, 20:37

Re: Is F1 getting boring?

Post

machin wrote:So what we've learnt from the past "few" pages is that:-

Lots of downforce and relatively little mechanical grip makes overtaking difficult, -yes, maybe the wake field can be improved, but either way, lots of downforce kills overtaking.
When did we learn that? Some people have loudly proclaimed that but there is no evidence of it.

Indeed, I posted a link to a site that shows overtake stats back to 1983 which is when "ground effect cars" were banned. Since then, overtaking reduced 'til about 1993-5 and it's been fairly level since then. Some better years, some less good years but none nearly as plentiful as the days before downforce was really limited.
If you are more fortunate than others, build a larger table not a taller fence.

PNSD
PNSD
3
Joined: 03 Apr 2006, 18:10

Re: Is F1 getting boring?

Post

Not read all the read, but why not place a limit on wing surface area for the front and rear, maybe something like Monza levels, then abandon the flat floor and introduce tunnels, albeit heavily regulated tunnels, such as the ones seen on the first GP2 car?

User avatar
machin
162
Joined: 25 Nov 2008, 14:45

Re: Is F1 getting boring?

Post

Is there any data for the period before there was lots of downforce?

I know I quote it all the time, but Formula Ford (a non-spec formula, apart from the engine) has no downforce and lots (and I mean LOTS) of overtaking.
COMPETITION CAR ENGINEERING -Home of VIRTUAL STOPWATCH

User avatar
Pandamasque
17
Joined: 09 Nov 2009, 17:28
Location: Kyiv, Ukraine

Re: Is F1 getting boring?

Post

Does any of the aero guys here watch sportscars? Le Mans prototypes have lots of DF but somehow able to follow each other very closely through the corners. What's the trick? The tyres are quite different, but what about the aero? Overtaking isn't supposed to be easy, it just supposed to possible and worth trying (which usually doesn't happen in F1).
WhiteBlue wrote:Regarding downforce restrictions it would make little sense to ask Adrian Newey or Nick Tombazis about this question. They would always argue that something else is at fault. When you ask where to prune the F1 tree none of the aerodynamicists would cut the branch off they are sitting on.
Wasn't it Newey who suggested that the 'balance' must be shifted from aero towards mechanical grip? Or it could be Brawn. :-k I remember reading something like that last year.

Just_a_fan
Just_a_fan
593
Joined: 31 Jan 2010, 20:37

Re: Is F1 getting boring?

Post

machin wrote:Is there any data for the period before there was lots of downforce?

I know I quote it all the time, but Formula Ford (a non-spec formula, apart from the engine) has no downforce and lots (and I mean LOTS) of overtaking.
Formula Ford has one other factor - hugely varying driver skill levels.

The single most important factor in overtaking is that the lead driver can be made to make a mistake. Pressure is key.

The drivers in F1 are not the sort who, the odd time excepted of course, are easily pressured into making mistakes.
If you are more fortunate than others, build a larger table not a taller fence.

marcush.
marcush.
159
Joined: 09 Mar 2004, 16:55

Re: Is F1 getting boring?

Post

Just_a_fan wrote:
machin wrote:Is there any data for the period before there was lots of downforce?

I know I quote it all the time, but Formula Ford (a non-spec formula, apart from the engine) has no downforce and lots (and I mean LOTS) of overtaking.
Formula Ford has one other factor - hugely varying driver skill levels.

The single most important factor in overtaking is that the lead driver can be made to make a mistake. Pressure is key.

The drivers in F1 are not the sort who, the odd time excepted of course, are easily pressured into making mistakes.

+1

User avatar
machin
162
Joined: 25 Nov 2008, 14:45

Re: Is F1 getting boring?

Post

The drivers in F1 are not the sort who, the odd time excepted of course, are easily pressured into making mistakes
...Even more reason to introduce a temporary power boost to allow the following driver to get close to the car in front.....
COMPETITION CAR ENGINEERING -Home of VIRTUAL STOPWATCH

User avatar
WhiteBlue
92
Joined: 14 Apr 2008, 20:58
Location: WhiteBlue Country

Re: Is F1 getting boring?

Post

All the drivers comment I have read so far indicate that mechanical grip needs to be improved and aero grip reduced.

http://www.motorsport-total.com/f1/news ... 32502.html
Rubens Barrichello wrote:It's not the weakness of the tyre, its the weakness of the rule," the Brazilian said in Melbourne. "We need more mechanical grip and less aerodynamic, its the only solution.
http://www.motorsport-total.com/f1/news ... 32404.html
Jenson Button wrote:They should listen to the drivers...They stole us some mechanical grip by downsizing the front tyres. At the same time the cars have better aerodynamics compared to last year. The problem is you lose downforce when you follow another car and the mechanical grip isn't there.
So in addition to cutting downforce to 1.2 tons we should have wider tyres front and rear, wider tracks, and harder tyres to avoid marbles.
Last edited by WhiteBlue on 25 Mar 2010, 10:43, edited 3 times in total.
Formula One's fundamental ethos is about success coming to those with the most ingenious engineering and best .............................. organization, not to those with the biggest budget. (Dave Richards)

User avatar
raceman
0
Joined: 25 Jul 2009, 08:57
Location: Pune, India

Re: Is F1 getting boring?

Post

WhiteBlue wrote:All the drivers comment I have read so far indicate that mechanical grip needs to be improved over aero grip.
Rubens Barrichello wrote:It's not the weakness of the tyre, its the weakness of the rule," the Brazilian said in Melbourne. "We need more mechanical grip, its the only solution.
So in addition to cutting downforce to 1.2 tons we should have wider tyres front and rear, wider tracks, and harder tyres to avoid marbles.

I think RB is quite rite here! Having more mechanical grip will empower drivers to think on making a move whilst they have increased confidence in cornering and breaking with the more mechanical grip. Wider tyres, yes, bring them on!

Ogami musashi
Ogami musashi
32
Joined: 13 Jun 2007, 22:57

Re: Is F1 getting boring?

Post

raceman wrote:
WhiteBlue wrote:All the drivers comment I have read so far indicate that mechanical grip needs to be improved over aero grip.
Rubens Barrichello wrote:It's not the weakness of the tyre, its the weakness of the rule," the Brazilian said in Melbourne. "We need more mechanical grip, its the only solution.
So in addition to cutting downforce to 1.2 tons we should have wider tyres front and rear, wider tracks, and harder tyres to avoid marbles.

I think RB is quite rite here! Having more mechanical grip will empower drivers to think on making a move whilst they have increased confidence in cornering and breaking with the more mechanical grip. Wider tyres, yes, bring them on!
Yeah more grip for tyres! like that braking distances in all slow and medium corners will be even less..


Having more mechanical grip is not the solution in itself, you have to be sure the downforce loss is not worse and guess what happens when you cut downforce by cutting dimensions?? Less finess...more wake! yeah!

What we've learned from this thread is that people like to spin on their random dreams, nobody added nothing...as usual.

User avatar
machin
162
Joined: 25 Nov 2008, 14:45

Re: Is F1 getting boring?

Post

Surely if mechanical grip is increased it will affect all cars, and therefore a leading car will have more confidence to brake later just as much as the chasing car and therefore the same situation occurs -stalemate.

I hear the argument about lower "quality" of drivers in formulae like formula ford... and this would explain more overtaking in the corners, but actually a lot of overtaking in FF and others like Caterhams occurs on the straights as a result of slipstreaming... its not so much the guy in front making a mistake its simply that the car behind has a distinct performance advantage over the car infront (in this case the slipstream effect) ...Its very exciting racing to watch. If F1 could replicate this style of racing (e.g. with a temporary power boost) I think we'd all love it; high cornering speeds (from the downforce) whilst also having lots of overtaking too...
COMPETITION CAR ENGINEERING -Home of VIRTUAL STOPWATCH