The diffuser vanes seem to concentrate the flow in the center also.Ferraripilot wrote:I would think the exhaust solution Merc are running provides enough turbulence to delay the boundary layer seperation thus negating the need for the rear wing tail skirt.
dren wrote:The diffuser vanes seem to concentrate the flow in the center also.Ferraripilot wrote:I would think the exhaust solution Merc are running provides enough turbulence to delay the boundary layer seperation thus negating the need for the rear wing tail skirt.
Probably. If they were trying to seal the diffuser, they would have the skirt too.Ferraripilot wrote:dren wrote:The diffuser vanes seem to concentrate the flow in the center also.Ferraripilot wrote:I would think the exhaust solution Merc are running provides enough turbulence to delay the boundary layer seperation thus negating the need for the rear wing tail skirt.
Have a look and Lotus aren't running a skirt either. It must be due to the exhaust option both are running.
Timstr wrote:The car has gained a vertical strut near the splitter.
Could be due to more balast on the tray area.
They confirmed upgraded suspension components? I am a bit behind the ball. Could this link be somehow tied to the suspension if they are indeed adjusting it?Ferraripilot wrote:Timstr wrote:The car has gained a vertical strut near the splitter.
Could be due to more balast on the tray area.
I saw them adjusting this strut during FP2 today. I'm wondering just how much they can lower their static ride height and what it's relation is to the upgraded internal suspenion components we know were tested at Mugello. I'm guessing they are bringing that tea tray as low as possible for their newly augmented ability to maintain ride height.
dren wrote:They confirmed upgraded suspension components? I am a bit behind the ball. Could this link be somehow tied to the suspension if they are indeed adjusting it?Ferraripilot wrote:Timstr wrote:The car has gained a vertical strut near the splitter.
Could be due to more balast on the tray area.
I saw them adjusting this strut during FP2 today. I'm wondering just how much they can lower their static ride height and what it's relation is to the upgraded internal suspenion components we know were tested at Mugello. I'm guessing they are bringing that tea tray as low as possible for their newly augmented ability to maintain ride height.
Ferraripilot wrote:
for their newly augmented ability to maintain ride height.
They confirmed upgraded suspension components? I am a bit behind the ball. Could this link be somehow tied to the suspension if they are indeed adjusting it?ivand911 wrote: Could be due to more balast on the tray area.
I saw them adjusting this strut during FP2 today. I'm wondering just how much they can lower their static ride height and what it's relation is to the upgraded internal suspenion components we know were tested at Mugello. I'm guessing they are bringing that tea tray as low as possible for their newly augmented ability to maintain ride height.
gilgen wrote:Ferraripilot wrote:
for their newly augmented ability to maintain ride height.
What 'newly augmented ability to maintain ride height'?
Such a system would surely be illegal?
PhillipM wrote:4 tenths from a carbon casing on the gearbox just from allowing easier setup/more ballast? Hmmm. A tenth or two maybe at best - easier in the long run on tyres probably more likely than any outright pace increase.