RBR running a 'smaller' rear wing has been the trend at most of the circuits this year, not just Spa. They appear to get a higher percentage of total downforce from the floor/diffuser than any other team. I think this is one reason they often struggle at Monza, as they can't cut the downforce/drag produced by the floor and end up with to low a top speed. But at the other 18 circuits they have the advantage.diffuser wrote:I noticed that we didn'r run the low downforce rear wing. I also noticed that in FP2, Massa was complaining of Oversteer with it. RBR did run their low downforce rear wing. That suggests that RBR are getting more downforce from their diffuser. We also know that the diffuser is more efficient at creating downforce than the rear wing and so in the end is that why RBR had more pace?
f300v10 wrote:RBR running a 'smaller' rear wing has been the trend at most of the circuits this year, not just Spa. They appear to get a higher percentage of total downforce from the floor/diffuser than any other team. I think this is one reason they often struggle at Monza, as they can't cut the downforce/drag produced by the floor and end up with to low a top speed. But at the other 18 circuits they have the advantage.diffuser wrote:I noticed that we didn'r run the low downforce rear wing. I also noticed that in FP2, Massa was complaining of Oversteer with it. RBR did run their low downforce rear wing. That suggests that RBR are getting more downforce from their diffuser. We also know that the diffuser is more efficient at creating downforce than the rear wing and so in the end is that why RBR had more pace?
That was on top of Eau Rouge, not at the end of the straight..Huntresa wrote: Point this year is that they can get good top speed tho even when getting DF from floor, just see at Spa.
el-Magico wrote:That was on top of Eau Rouge, not at the end of the straight..Huntresa wrote: Point this year is that they can get good top speed tho even when getting DF from floor, just see at Spa.
I think Red Bull is still using shorter gears for faster acceleration.
So the speed at the top of Eau Rogue is scrubbed of in a straight line or ? Just go get some onboard footage with speedo and we shall see.el-Magico wrote:That was on top of Eau Rouge, not at the end of the straight..Huntresa wrote: Point this year is that they can get good top speed tho even when getting DF from floor, just see at Spa.
I think Red Bull is still using shorter gears for faster acceleration.
RB was fastest through the speed trap, but the speed trap is not at the end of the straight, but on top of Eau Rouge.Huntresa wrote: So the speed at the top of Eau Rouge is scrubbed of in a straight line or ? Just go get some onboard footage with speedo and we shall see.
Huntresa wrote:f300v10 wrote:RBR running a 'smaller' rear wing has been the trend at most of the circuits this year, not just Spa. They appear to get a higher percentage of total downforce from the floor/diffuser than any other team. I think this is one reason they often struggle at Monza, as they can't cut the downforce/drag produced by the floor and end up with to low a top speed. But at the other 18 circuits they have the advantage.diffuser wrote:I noticed that we didn'r run the low downforce rear wing. I also noticed that in FP2, Massa was complaining of Oversteer with it. RBR did run their low downforce rear wing. That suggests that RBR are getting more downforce from their diffuser. We also know that the diffuser is more efficient at creating downforce than the rear wing and so in the end is that why RBR had more pace?
Point this year is that they can get good top speed tho even when getting DF from floor, just see at Spa.
el-Magico wrote:That was on top of Eau Rouge, not at the end of the straight..Huntresa wrote: Point this year is that they can get good top speed tho even when getting DF from floor, just see at Spa.
I think Red Bull is still using shorter gears for faster acceleration.
Especially at Spa.SchumacherM wrote:Speed trap speed is not neccessarily THE top speed of the track.