While the technical regulations regarding the power units are going into their 4th stable year, Mercedes' engine Chief, Andy Cowell, has noted there are still gains to be made. Cowell underlined that the key to these continued improvements are Mercedes' proven testing facility.
Oh, did they? Well they should be able to, in theory.
I had a weird suspiscion that the type of motor they use is different to the others. One that would have less low speed efficiency but higher full load efficiency and needs less electronics. But can't quite say for sure.
Oh, did they? Well they should be able to, in theory.
I had a weird suspiscion that the type of motor they use is different to the others. One that would have less low speed efficiency but higher full load efficiency and needs less electronics. But can't quite say for sure.
What sort of difference would produce that outcome? Electric motors are a total dark area for me.
Very amateur PU question from me guys but as a McLaren fan intrigued by their return to Mercedes power, I’m trying to nip in the bud some things I read back at the start of the hybrid era:
In 2014, there was a bit of chatter about customer teams not knowing how to maximise the PU performance in the same way as a works team- are we now in a time where the FIA strongly regulates the usage and software shares from works to customer?
In 2014 I believe McLaren were still a Mobil fuel partner. With Mercedes being in great synergy with Petronas, I’m led to believe that the works team generated far better/more efficient performance using Petronas and that McLaren may have hindered themselves using Mobil that year- is this correct in any way? And with that in mind, is it now the case that all customers get the same fuels and lubricants as the works provider? (ie, use Petronas even if sponsored by Gulf, for example)
There was that podcast a few years ago from the ex Lotus guy who talked about engine modes and that there was an occasion where they were given a mode mid-race to fight a Merc rival that the drivers reported to be far better than anything they’d had before but that the Merc engineer wouldn’t tell them what it was or how it was achieved, and I suppose that really lit my interest in the subject, especially when McLaren announced they were going to be a Merc partner again.
Oh, did they? Well they should be able to, in theory.
I had a weird suspiscion that the type of motor they use is different to the others. One that would have less low speed efficiency but higher full load efficiency and needs less electronics. But can't quite say for sure.
the maximum MGU-K torque allowed is 200 Nm (crankshaft referred)
the further below c.6000 rpm they go the further the MGU-K power must fall below 120 kW
Very amateur PU question from me guys but as a McLaren fan intrigued by their return to Mercedes power, I’m trying to nip in the bud some things I read back at the start of the hybrid era:
In 2014, there was a bit of chatter about customer teams not knowing how to maximise the PU performance in the same way as a works team- are we now in a time where the FIA strongly regulates the usage and software shares from works to customer?
In 2014 I believe McLaren were still a Mobil fuel partner. With Mercedes being in great synergy with Petronas, I’m led to believe that the works team generated far better/more efficient performance using Petronas and that McLaren may have hindered themselves using Mobil that year- is this correct in any way? And with that in mind, is it now the case that all customers get the same fuels and lubricants as the works provider? (ie, use Petronas even if sponsored by Gulf, for example)
There was that podcast a few years ago from the ex Lotus guy who talked about engine modes and that there was an occasion where they were given a mode mid-race to fight a Merc rival that the drivers reported to be far better than anything they’d had before but that the Merc engineer wouldn’t tell them what it was or how it was achieved, and I suppose that really lit my interest in the subject, especially when McLaren announced they were going to be a Merc partner again.
One important thing as far as Mclaren are concerned is that the rule is 'things' must be available to all customers, not all must be the same. There are many small points that differ as Mclaren will have a different design principle to Merc and will use many of their own 'bits' such as cooling exhaust etc and wil not want the ones Merc are using or want to run with the same settings.
Is it decided which fuel Mclaren is using yet?
When arguing with a fool, be sure the other person is not doing the same thing.
On the subject of newb like questions, When did Mercedes first start work on their V6 Hybrid? I read Andy Cowell say the first design was 2012, but then read di Montezemolo saying Lauda told him 2007 !? Surely that was the KERS hybrid V8?
GoLandoGo
Lewis v2.0
King George has arrived.
New found love for GT racing with Assetto Corsa Competizione on PS5 & PC
Most manufacturers started the work in 2011-2012 when regulations seemed firm enough (inline 4, 1.6l). I don't know how far everyone got with that engine but Merc and AER both had it designed and running on the dyno before Ferrari insisted on a V6.
To say anyone could have started earlier than that is pure nonsense. Absolutely no one could have anticipated what the regs could have been back in 2007 particularly given the big shake-up caused by the last minute change to the engine architecture in 2012.
Of course most manufacturers have been involved with electric motors and batteries since the start of the KERS era and much of that technology was transfered to current engines. To say that is some sort of unfair advantage is a bit like saying Daimler had the upper hand because they have been building engines for 120 years.
These things are never single events - but an ongoing strategy.
You could say HPP began to work on V6T in 2012 but a precursor to that was bringing KERS in-house in 2010; as they knew understanding how to build electric motors and marrying electric motor control to the combustion engine would be important in 2014. KERS 2011-2013 was part of the learning for 2014+.
Likewise they knew electrification was coming in with KERS in 2009, so they started thinking about that from 2007. The learning from that experience allowing them to plan for KERS in 2011+.
I guess also when looking to the future in 2008 time era they identified a need to trial all this with their own team so when Honda/Brawn needed rescuing they took the opportunity.
To this day there appears to be a strategy reaching into Daimler as a whole. It is no coincidence that the MD of HPP in 2007/8/9 is now the chairman of Daimler; and they use HPP as development path for the mothership e.g. Project One 'supercar" and dabbling with full electric via the FE programme which presumably comes from the same group that did KERS/ERS in earlier years.