It wouldn't be the first time indeed. I think Mercedes will be fine, the media want to find the ''silver bullet'', but it's just speculation.n smikle wrote:Fear mongering from the Ferrari rumor mill. Pretty much rubbish.
It wouldn't be the first time indeed. I think Mercedes will be fine, the media want to find the ''silver bullet'', but it's just speculation.n smikle wrote:Fear mongering from the Ferrari rumor mill. Pretty much rubbish.
Especially since the revs are down this year. Cosworth was saying they needed the full 500 to fill the cylinders with a sufficiently good mix at >20,000rpm, but i'm sure it'll just be nice to have the finer atomisation at 15k, and no big deal one way or the other really.MustGoFaster wrote:And really would the true impact of only being able to inject fuel at 450 or 480 bar compared to 500?
My bit of searching would indicate that even at something like a measly 400 bar injection pressure, it would be possible to inject fuel at ANY point in the engine's cycle, including peak cylinder pressure. Lower pressures may affect atomization of the fuel, but if you started with a design more focused on atomization, than peak pressure capability, maybe you can achieve adequate results at lower pressures.
Hitting some limit in a rule book is not the goal. Beating the other guy, while not getting disqualified, is.
I didnt know that the teams exchanged simulator data to compare before the season.Sonic wrote:What do you think about Jonathan Noble's point of view :
"The F1 gossip machine is already hinting that Mercedes will be the team to beat, with the paddock grapevine suggesting it is pretty upbeat about its 2014 design performance compared to rival outfits."
What I think: There has NEVER, in the history of F1, been an instance of someone knowing the comparative form of the teams before any testing.Sonic wrote:What do you think about Jonathan Noble's point of view :
"The F1 gossip machine is already hinting that Mercedes will be the team to beat, with the paddock grapevine suggesting it is pretty upbeat about its 2014 design performance compared to rival outfits."
You forgot RB.Maynard G. Krebs wrote:I think one thing you can say (and has been said before) is that Mercedes and Ferrari have a CHANCE to have an advantage since they have been able to develop the car and engine in parallel, whereas the others have to wait until the engine is pretty much done before they can integrate it.
True, but it's not like Mercedes haven't been quite optimistic about the prospects for 2014 aswell.Sonic wrote:@ Helios,
This is Jonathan Noble speaking, not MGP !