I am already looking forward to the frame-by-frame discussions and proofs that Ham/Ros is to blame
Can someone please hand me some Popcorn?
Oh sure, I'm defending Hamilton. I already said it: They are both equally stupid. They were both to blame.GrayGreat wrote:
Oh please. Respect? For years everybody kept saying Nico is not aggressive and does not have the spark in him that world champions do. Now when he defended his position, you are saying he was wrong? Stop being biased, and stop defending Hamilton blindly. There was no room on the track, Nico covered the track before any part of the Hamilton's car was alongside. Hamilton should have braked, that's all.
Edit: Offense was multiple times more aggressive than the defense, don't forget that. Rosberg was leading, why should he leave any room when he is not entilted to? (Lauda's words).
There is no such rule.wesley123 wrote:Oh sure, I'm defending Hamilton. I already said it: They are both equally stupid. They were both to blame.GrayGreat wrote:
Oh please. Respect? For years everybody kept saying Nico is not aggressive and does not have the spark in him that world champions do. Now when he defended his position, you are saying he was wrong? Stop being biased, and stop defending Hamilton blindly. There was no room on the track, Nico covered the track before any part of the Hamilton's car was alongside. Hamilton should have braked, that's all.
Edit: Offense was multiple times more aggressive than the defense, don't forget that. Rosberg was leading, why should he leave any room when he is not entilted to? (Lauda's words).
However, that doesn't change that a bit of decency on track isn't too much to ask. Rosberg crossed the whole track in his defensive move. That's a bit over-the-top and I'm surprised that isn't illegal
It's Hamilton's fault if he did not defend. Its not a friendly soccer game. It's formula 1. Guy in front can do pretty much what he want unless someone is alongside him before the defensive move or if he moves twice, and both these things did not happen as far as I am aware.jurinius wrote:That's not all. Lewis didn't defend aggressively when nico passed him before, so why Nico shouldn't do the same as far as he knew he was too slow before the corner ?GrayGreat wrote:Oh please. Respect? For years everybody kept saying Nico is not aggressive and does not have the spark in him that world champions do. Now when he defended his position, you are saying he was wrong? Stop being biased, and stop defending Hamilton blindly. There was no room on the track, Nico covered the track before any part of the Hamilton's car was alongside. Hamilton should have braked, that's all.wesley123 wrote: Sounds like a bit of respect to me to not cross the whole track to defend. The defense was waaaay too agressive
Edit: Offense was multiple times more aggressive than the defense, don't forget that. Rosberg was leading, why should he leave any room when he is not entilted to? (Lauda's words).
There is a general rule about crowding and "abnormal change of direction". The question, of course, is how does one define "abnormal"? Usually there is the defence of "taking his normal line" such as at the exit of a corner where the line goes out to the track edge.GrayGreat wrote:There is no such rule.However, that doesn't change that a bit of decency on track isn't too much to ask. Rosberg crossed the whole track in his defensive move. That's a bit over-the-top and I'm surprised that isn't illegal
Great I was expecting this kind of answer "it is not a friendly bla bla" Racing drivers follow official rules but many times they are doing thing on the track for the best, eg "Let someone have a clean way even under blue flag waving". Rosberg is the championship leader now, we can say that Lewis has nothing to loose here if this is going to happen again. Lets see then Nico muscle until the end...GrayGreat wrote:It's Hamilton's fault if he did not defend. Its not a friendly soccer game. It's formula 1. Guy in front can do pretty much what he want unless someone is alongside him before the defensive move or if he moves twice, and both these things did not happen as far as I am aware.jurinius wrote:That's not all. Lewis didn't defend aggressively when nico passed him before, so why Nico shouldn't do the same as far as he knew he was too slow before the corner ?GrayGreat wrote:
Oh please. Respect? For years everybody kept saying Nico is not aggressive and does not have the spark in him that world champions do. Now when he defended his position, you are saying he was wrong? Stop being biased, and stop defending Hamilton blindly. There was no room on the track, Nico covered the track before any part of the Hamilton's car was alongside. Hamilton should have braked, that's all.
Edit: Offense was multiple times more aggressive than the defense, don't forget that. Rosberg was leading, why should he leave any room when he is not entilted to? (Lauda's words).
"any driver defending his position on a straight and before any braking area may use the full width of the track during his first move provided no significant portion of the car attempting to pass is alongside his. Whilst defending in this way the driver may not leave the track without justifiable reason."
It all comes down to whether or not Hamilton had his front wing next to Rosberg´s rear wheels before leaving the track."For the avoidance of doubt, if any part of the front wing of the car attempting to pass is alongside the rear wheel of the car in front this will be deemed to be a 'significant portion"
You can't really move to the left when you are already on the rightAnthonyG wrote:Rosberg left more than enough space on the left, Hamilton's at fault.
What a bunch of nagging fanboys here.