I dunno, I really dunno if I'd agree with that much tbh.
The leading edge of the diffuser (where the flat floor disappears) isn't moving... the leading edge of the venturi duct effective entry is. Even picture aerodynamicists know about Bernoulli's law... and while it doesn't apply a lot of the time in aerodynamics, it actually does for F1 cars most of the time. Its a well established routine that longer wheelbase = more downforce, precisely because of the greater floor area & Bernoulli. Hell, teams even employ small wings ahead of the sidepod to try and induce a longitudinal vortex down the side of the car to try and stop flow getting in under the car from the side.
By leaking the floor you probably will move the floor aero centre back - but I feel your losing out on downforce overall. I'm not even sure if it will make the local diffuser perform better, you've probably got air with a higher turbulence level coming in now as it has relatively little path length to travel before being at the diffuser.
It could be that this is a band aid fix to move the aero centre back - particularly the ride height sensitive aero centre. But, I'm somewhat dubious as to whether it improves overall L/D ratios.
The only area I see it doing something else is the rear wheel stagnation point. It could be positively influencing it (somehow) in a way I don't yet know. Totally turbulent area of the car - guesstimating what is happening there is very much impossible.
But my gut instinct says this isn't going to be a feature seen on many other cars through the year. However, I've been wrong before....