But Withmarsh also said the 26 would have some features we would write alot about
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_e_smile.gif)
End January/Start February is better than christmas to me
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_e_smile.gif)
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_e_smile.gif)
+1Holm86 wrote:To me "drastic" just means something way different.
But Withmarsh also said the 26 would have some features we would write alot about
End January/Start February is better than christmas to meIm so exited about the next weeks time
Please dont mind some idiots pointing out to your usage of a word.scarbs wrote:"Drastic" was the word I was told, I haven't seen it but my contact has. Here it is in context "No the mp4-26 is pretty different, its quite drastic and should give you a lot to write about"
Hmmm. From the picture the nose looks like a slightly fatter version of an Mp4-23/22. But i'm not even sure if this is actually it, McLaren wouldnt do something like that.borgulator wrote:mp4 26 first pic, under cover.
http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=htt ... CB8Q9QEwAg
Enhanced:borgulator wrote:mp4 26 first pic, under cover.
http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=htt ... CB8Q9QEwAg
What's more important, it seems very low.timbo wrote:Airbox seems bigger
I've also noticed that it's slightly asymmetric in the place where F-duct snorkel should be, but on the other hand nose really looks different. So I'm little confused hereRedTzar wrote:Hi guys, I'm new here.
I was excited when I first saw the image but the more I look at it the more it seems to be the MP4-25. The air intake over the drivers head is the same shape as last year, the nose higher but that may be the image angle and the front wing looks early 2010 to me. But the biggest give away for me is just on the right of the vane on the nose. It looks like the f-duct snorkel. If it is the -26 and it is the snorkel then its a major talking point.