no cascades , same as canadaclipsy1H wrote:Any uptade for Valencia?
BTW: This car is so fast on Sector 1 but lose over 0.300 on sector 2 and Sector 3 is kinda normal.
i can understand that at canada, but why did they remove it in valencia?
![Wtf? :wtf:](./images/smilies/icon_wtf.gif)
pic
![Image](http://cdn.images.autosport.com/editorial/1340375132.jpg)
no cascades , same as canadaclipsy1H wrote:Any uptade for Valencia?
BTW: This car is so fast on Sector 1 but lose over 0.300 on sector 2 and Sector 3 is kinda normal.
B-spec? The one where they made small modifications to the sidepods?mantikos wrote:You guys seem to ignore the damn near B-spec car they launched a couple of races ago, do you expect them to have a new car every 2 races?
As for the front wing, I think this might be more about a balance thing rather than anything else.
Joie de vivre wrote:since TC is banned, teams should be looking for better ways to maximize the downforce (brawn double dif. i.e.), and rbr's new exhaust/air flow system ... well at least some teams know the downforce is the most important factor (why on earth was rbr so dominant with EBD? and also brawn w/ DD?)
i don't care about FW, this team realy needs to start reconsidering revising this exhaust layout and max. the downforce ... also reducing degredation of tires
i bet vettel will win this gp
Owen.C93 wrote:B-spec? The one where they made small modifications to the sidepods?mantikos wrote:You guys seem to ignore the damn near B-spec car they launched a couple of races ago, do you expect them to have a new car every 2 races?
As for the front wing, I think this might be more about a balance thing rather than anything else.
What's wrong with this way?Ferraripilot wrote:one would think F1 would have a more clever way to bleed brakes by now. Guess not