I think that's fair.Mansell89 wrote:I think we need to admit that McLaren has all areas to work on if they want to be even daydreaming of podiums in 2017.
By their long-term high standards, again fair.Mansell89 wrote:Poor.
And believe me, I say it as one of their biggest fans.adrianjordan wrote:I think that's fair.Mansell89 wrote:I think we need to admit that McLaren has all areas to work on if they want to be even daydreaming of podiums in 2017.
By their long-term high standards, again fair.Mansell89 wrote:Poor.
Yep but they're quicker than some f1 cars in the corners. The engine is a 2L i4 turbo with fuel limited 100kg/hr(Honda v Toyota)Alonso Fan wrote:Awesomekaepernickus wrote:Stoffel has won the final Super Formula race at Suzuka.
Finishing the season in 4th place overall, with 2 wins, 1 third place, 1 pole and as best Honda driver. =D>
Is super formula a spec series?
Definitely. Remember how dearly the pit stops cost them in 2012 with a championship winning car.Sayeman wrote:Mclaren needs to fire some of the Pit crews. I swear almost every race there has to be one messed up pitstop for the 2 drivers.
“We also had some issues with our power units, Fernando suffering from an anomaly in the ICE whereby we were forced to detune the output, and Jenson showed a temperature rise in the ERS whereby he wasn’t able to use the maximum performance mode at the end of the race. I am mostly disappointed as it feels like we have unfinished business and couldn't challenge enough on the track.
Corrected that for you sirMansell89 wrote: They need another HUGE jump. I'm a little deflated to be honest.
QFTMansell89 wrote:I think we need to admit that McLaren has all areas to work on if they want to be even daydreaming of podiums in 2017.
Poor.
2nd troll or 2nd account? I guess the latter. Keep trolling guys, if you think that's gonna influence other people to your troll side or that will give you pleasure go ahead and do it giving wrong data and stupid opinions.kasio wrote:Everyone is not You. You is just YOU! I am Everyone and i do not think he is wrong.Pierce89 wrote:Get over it. Everyone else thinks you're wrong. Go cheer FOR a team instead of against one. Its sad, really.techman wrote:mclaren chassis is high drag inefficient chassis compared to TR. TR dont run monkey wings or the batman wing i believe in mexico, and they chassis is much better than mclaren in mid speed corner, it all down to good efficient downforce unlike mclaren, who will run all the wings they can see other run but will still be slow. mclaren really need to check their aero correlations if they are to compete next year, because they will be expose when the FIA starts monitoring the engine performance, and cant hide behind honda like they are doing now. e.f1i.com 15:23 - Unsurprisingly, both Toro Rossos are the slowest through the speed trap with their year-old engine. 350kph for Sainz and 348kph for Kvyat. That's over 15kph slower than Mercedes-powered Massa.. mclaren have a chassis problem that they need to address they really want to compete next year.
wow, you're looking waaaaaay into the future.techman wrote:good job by jenson even though he had a ERS problem, race pace was good for a one stopper. hopefully in 2018 jenson and vandorne will partner for Mclaren . i dont think anyone would want alonso for the salaray he is asking. mclaren need drivers that motivate the team and not whinners
They have developed no doubt, but I think people underestimate just how much dominance in so many areas that Merc have that they have to get correct all in this short winter.Andres125sx wrote:Corrected that for you sirMansell89 wrote: They need another HUGE jump. I'm a little deflated to be honest.
From past season to this one they improved 3 position in the WCC (from 9th to 6th) and multiplied their points by a factor of 3 at least (27 vs 74 with two races to go). Ok the starting point was pathetic, but they received the deserved bashing past season, this one we must analyse how much they improved, and they improved quite a lot, specially the PU improved more than I thought possible considering the token restriction.
Heck they´ve improved to the point they´re doing laptimes for first row of past season grid consistently. Problem is not lack of development of McHonda, but the rest also improved a lot and that´s hidding McHonda development.
A similar step forward next season, and they´ll be fighting for podiums and even some sporadic victory when front runners have some problem
BTW I don´t see anyone claiming they have a great chassis, people say they have fourth chassis. In my book that´s far from praiseworthy for McLaren, but they have 4th chassis and 7-8th PU, so the weakest part is still the PU
This said, in my imagination they only have 4th chassis because they´re not developing the chassis in 2016 season, they´re preparing 2017 unit wich requires new concepts, so they´re using 2016 season as a looong pre-season testing. At least that´s what I´d have done in their position, remember they said from day one this is a long term project, so it would be utterly stupid to waste resources to develop 2016 chassis