This is the result using the complete formula with respect to the output of adams:Tim.Wright wrote: ↑19 Jul 2021, 23:15Looks like the motion ratio is quite non-linear. Try using the complete formula for calulating the wheel rate which takes into account motion ratio non-linearities:
Kwheel = Kspring x MotionRatio^2 + Fspring x dMotionRatio/dWheelTravel
Compare this to the Adams calculated wheel rate - should be a lot closer.
I have also compared the MR computed as square root of the stiffness ratio and the one evaluated with the slope of the spring displacement with respect to the wheel travel:
According to the output of adams the wheel rate drops in the final part of the wheel travelGreg Locock wrote: ↑20 Jul 2021, 01:16Your description was out, you have a continuously increasing wheel rate. In theory that rate curve should just be a straight line with zero gradient. Your spring length plot says the MR is about 0.6, so the wheelrate should be around 84 N/mm