Yes, but the issue you still have to be able to prove it. Without anything solid and just suspicion to go on, you are just throwing money away in court. Worse, Ferrari could in turn sue Mercedes for slander.GoranF1 wrote:Only people who think we live in some fairy tail can belive Ferrari didnt get that data.
McLaren probably had no idea that the data Ferraris Stepney sent them was stolen either , but it would have been fairly obvious that it was Ferrari property ...but they still had the data ,and paid for it dearly.giantfan10 wrote:even if Ferrari has the data their easy defense is we didnt know he stole it and have no idea how he aquired it
I agreeturbof1 wrote:Yes, but the issue you still have to be able to prove it. Without anything solid and just suspicion to go on, you are just throwing money away in court. Worse, Ferrari could in turn sue Mercedes for slander.GoranF1 wrote:Only people who think we live in some fairy tail can belive Ferrari didnt get that data.
There will be an investigation now. We'll see if it brings anything solid leading to Ferrari.
If you went through a secure VPN at an internet cafe that would be pretty difficult to track.FoxHound wrote:Assuming that, there would still be trails left. If it was uploaded onto the internet, you can be sure it will be traceable via some form of storage device signature.turbof1 wrote:You can only track the IP adress for a physical location. It's not a stretch to go inside an internet cafe, any university with open door policy or even just buy a laptop with cash money and go to a place with public wifi (and afterwards destroy the laptop or atleast its internet hardware), and download the data on an usb stick. Untrackable.
Where it would become murky is if he use a proxy server in a cafe.
But even this would incriminate him, as there would be a record to show he used a proxy server. What reasonable excuse would you have to use a proxy server in an internet cafe/public wifi location?
And if they can't find the device, because it has been destroyed...this too would be incriminating. And from Sawards story, there were several devices involved here.
You are joking right, this is a pretty standard procedure for an issue like this, regardless of the industry.R_Redding wrote: This Merc scenario looks more like sour grapes over losing an engineer who knows all the secrets. The fact they want him sidelined until 2017 affirms this ..were it purely about provable data theft, the sidelining would not be a issue as they'd expect a custodial sentence.
This is a civil lawsuit not a criminal lawsuit. So the punishment will be some sorts of compensation to Mercedes HPP. However, in these cases, Claimant must produce evidence beyond the balance of probabilities.ME4ME wrote:Assuming the man is guilty, what would his punishment be in England? A month in prison?
Well if this guy is coming now and shows some e-mails (exchanged with Ferrari people) then Ferrari is toasted!lio007 wrote:update on that:
https://twitter.com/PatrickGower/status ... 8840289281
EDIT: oh, just realized that GoranF1 already gave us the update
If they have the data then they are holding stolen property. That's a crime in just about every jurisdiction in the world. Saying "we didn't know he stole the data" is no defence because they know they shouldn't have it at all.giantfan10 wrote:The employee is pretty much toast as far as stealing data... good luck to mercedes in their attempt to incriminate Ferrari.... they would have to prove that Ferrari made their current employee commit this theft for their gain....even if Ferrari has the data their easy defense is we didnt know he stole it and have no idea how he aquired it