OneAlex wrote: β29 Jun 2017, 18:37
I feel like I sparked a bit of commotion with my comment. I apologise for doing do and also apologise for any offence caused. I do however stand by the comment, it's a fact of China that many businesses and countries have to deal with, from cars to fighter jets.
I was just looking at it from the view that Formula 1 is notoriously protective when it comes to technology and what is and isn't shared. Understandable given many teams treat F1 as an exercise in R&D for technologies on top of the brand exposure for the larger international companies (its almost impossible to make money in f1 so no one owns a team for that).
China is a massive auto market, as is Asia in general, so it makes sense for them to get into the game if it leads to them understanding and catching up further on auto technology. But I think Honda especially would be reticent to join up with an unknown consortium and risk a country that would be a key market competitor acquiring Honda's work.
I have no problem with you saying that. It is true, and I think there is no shame in a country reverse engineering other technologies to "catch up". After all the whole US industrial revolution started with reverse engineering European technologies.
But there comes a certain point where reverse engineering does not pay off. Reverse engineering does not necessarely mean you have less development costs, certainly not for more advanced technologies, and even if so being first to market outweighs advantages you might gain from copying.
I think China now has reached that point where they have to develop their own technologies to grow, and you slowly see a shifting attitude towards R&D. Personally I think that is a good thing. You might view it as an increase in competition. It is true, but on the other hand the larger the pool of people working on certain subjects, and the more competition, the faster we will grow as a whole.