I take a similar view- Merc still top the pecking order but both Ferrari and even more so Red Bull have begun to understand and then maximise the potential of their car philosophies.search wrote: ↑30 Jul 2019, 20:40yeah, I agree that Spielberg and Hockenheim didn't reflect a change, but in Silverstone (especially in the Qualifying) Red Bull and Ferrari were way closer than what I expected. A couple of races ago, Mercedes would have taken pole by half a second.Sieper wrote: ↑30 Jul 2019, 19:42We don’t know Max’ real pace in Silverstone. He was caught behind Leclerc who made very sure Max wasn’t getting passed. RBR seem optimistic. I am very curious. Also what Ferrari can do. They might outqualify them all. Passing on track in Hungary is so very very hard.Pyrone89 wrote: ↑30 Jul 2019, 19:21Unless Merc decided to gift RB the plans to their W10 there is no reason to think the RB15 can beat the W10 under normal conditions at this time. People somehow think Austria and Germany were a reflection of a change in structural pace, but it is not. It were two races were team operations, specific car trouble (cooling) and especially driver errors (Bottas crash Germany, Ham crash Germany, Ham breaking his front wing over yellow curbs in Austria) made a big enough impact to overrule the normal running order. Just look at the Merc pace in Silverstone race and Germany FP long runs.
Not really. A. The prevailing wisdom is that there’s really no significant benefit these days in changing your set up from the optimum dry level (there is no ‘wet setup’ any more); there’d be no benefit of them dozing something so risky as doing everything they could to get on pole (the forecast was pretty changeable and no guarantee it would rain on race day), particularly as they were fully expecting to be competing with Ferrari B. They qualified significantly ahead of the lead Red Bull - and way ahead of everyone else - you think they did with a compromised setup?digitalrurouni wrote: ↑30 Jul 2019, 20:16That makes sense actually.dans79 wrote: ↑30 Jul 2019, 17:07Personally, I think they set the car up for a wet race, and thus compromised their dry & mixed running pace.digitalrurouni wrote: ↑30 Jul 2019, 16:49So Toto seemed to indicate the upgrade had done its job at the German GP but it didn't seem that way. Ya think there's a chance they are gonna revert the upgrades for the Hungary GP? I am thinking not. But during qualifying it didn't seem like the car was that bolted to the ground. I mean last year's lap record still stands.
I would have thought aero levels would be tweaked and suspension at the minimum for mixed weather driving.f1316 wrote: ↑31 Jul 2019, 12:43Not really. A. The prevailing wisdom is that there’s really no significant benefit these days in changing your set up from the optimum dry level (there is no ‘wet setup’ any more); there’d be no benefit of them dozing something so risky as doing everything they could to get on pole (the forecast was pretty changeable and no guarantee it would rain on race day), particularly as they were fully expecting to be competing with Ferrari B. They qualified significantly ahead of the lead Red Bull - and way ahead of everyone else - you think they did with a compromised setup?
It’s just not logical nor reflected in anything we saw in the car’s handling performance throughout weekend; it may well have worked as expected - and wouldn’t be the first time this year a track just doesn’t suit the W10 as much as the SF90 - and I fully expect Mercedes to be well ahead, particularly on race pace vs Ferrari, this weekend.
They still have wet set-ups, they just aren't as dramatically different as they once were. Its no different to when a front of the grid team tweaks the set-up when they know they have to start at the back or from the pit lane. It's not dramatic but it makes a difference!f1316 wrote: ↑31 Jul 2019, 12:43Not really. A. The prevailing wisdom is that there’s really no significant benefit these days in changing your set up from the optimum dry level (there is no ‘wet setup’ any more); there’d be no benefit of them dozing something so risky as doing everything they could to get on pole (the forecast was pretty changeable and no guarantee it would rain on race day), particularly as they were fully expecting to be competing with Ferrari B. They qualified significantly ahead of the lead Red Bull - and way ahead of everyone else - you think they did with a compromised setup?
Well, in their own Mercedes youtube debrief really, but indeed, that was one of the many mistakes they can say, with hindsight, they made: 'we had a lot to look at today' (ie. Monday)
Yes Max could be right there this weekend, that car is getting better every race, and yes at the same time Mercedes will be out for revenge on maximum attack! Intense...bosyber wrote: ↑31 Jul 2019, 19:52I wouldn't be surprised to see the package work scarily well the coming weekend, as Mercedes really do seem to learn from mistakes, and sometimes very quickly. But, with Red Bull/Verstappen looking solid, it might still be a good fight. Not sure Ferrari will be up there though, not much straights and high speed corners to get them in the mix.
Its not as if its a matter of life or death, its FAR more important than that