Mostly affected qualifying. Gap to LEC would have probably been 4 or 5 tenths instead of 7 tenths (HAM's best sectors would have put him c. 0.5-0.6s back)
But how do u know his best s1 and s3 sectors when they ran conservative mode in s1 and s3??
The 0.5-0.6s gap would have been had HAM nailed his best sectors together (with lower PU mode). From Toto's comments, the engine mode would not have made a material difference (a tenth or two at most). 3-4 was the best the team could have done ultimately, as VET's best sectors would have put him 0.2s off LEC.siskue2005 wrote: ↑04 Sep 2019, 15:29But how do u know his best s1 and s3 sectors when they ran conservative mode in s1 and s3??
Btw how strong is the slipstream this year! There is massive difference to last years cars... so this is going to determine the pole in italy
Where did Toto say that a tenth or two is what their maximum engine mode is worth? Any link or sourcemkay wrote: ↑04 Sep 2019, 15:35The 0.5-0.6s gap would have been had HAM nailed his best sectors together (with lower PU mode). From Toto's comments, the engine mode would not have made a material difference (a tenth or two at most). 3-4 was the best the team could have done ultimately, as VET's best sectors would have put him 0.2s off LEC.siskue2005 wrote: ↑04 Sep 2019, 15:29But how do u know his best s1 and s3 sectors when they ran conservative mode in s1 and s3??
Btw how strong is the slipstream this year! There is massive difference to last years cars... so this is going to determine the pole in italy
Which put's him in front of Vettel at the start, potentially challenging Charles off the line (Hamilton made a good start).
He didn't say specifically, but his comments implied that higher PU mode wouldn't have changed the outcome of qualifying.siskue2005 wrote: ↑04 Sep 2019, 15:37Where did Toto say that a tenth or two is what their maximum engine mode is worth? Any link or sourcemkay wrote: ↑04 Sep 2019, 15:35The 0.5-0.6s gap would have been had HAM nailed his best sectors together (with lower PU mode). From Toto's comments, the engine mode would not have made a material difference (a tenth or two at most). 3-4 was the best the team could have done ultimately, as VET's best sectors would have put him 0.2s off LEC.siskue2005 wrote: ↑04 Sep 2019, 15:29
But how do u know his best s1 and s3 sectors when they ran conservative mode in s1 and s3??
Btw how strong is the slipstream this year! There is massive difference to last years cars... so this is going to determine the pole in italy
so why were you claiming this>>?mkay wrote: ↑04 Sep 2019, 17:27He didn't say specifically, but his comments implied that higher PU mode wouldn't have changed the outcome of qualifying.siskue2005 wrote: ↑04 Sep 2019, 15:37Where did Toto say that a tenth or two is what their maximum engine mode is worth? Any link or sourcemkay wrote: ↑04 Sep 2019, 15:35
The 0.5-0.6s gap would have been had HAM nailed his best sectors together (with lower PU mode). From Toto's comments, the engine mode would not have made a material difference (a tenth or two at most). 3-4 was the best the team could have done ultimately, as VET's best sectors would have put him 0.2s off LEC.
please dont put your opinion as someone else's quote!The 0.5-0.6s gap would have been had HAM nailed his best sectors together (with lower PU mode). From Toto's comments, the engine mode would not have made a material difference (a tenth or two at most)
yup the slip stream train will be worse hereyelistener wrote: ↑04 Sep 2019, 16:05Mercedes said on their youtube channel that the slipstream in Spa is worth about 0.3-0.5s. In Monza it obviously will be a lot more. I wouldn't be surprised if Monza quali turns into a total clusterf**k when everyone wants to get behind someone, and by the end of Q3 suddenly 2- 3 cars in the back decide they have to pass the cars in front or their session will be over before passing the finish line, and then of cause the cars in front their final Q3 lap will be completely f**ked. Parabolica, being a relatively fast corner, will only make it worse because you need some distance to build up the speed.
I bet this kind of quali slipstream ridiculousness will reach a new height next year.
Agreed. Q3 will be a total mess with multiple frustrated drivers after quali.yelistener wrote: ↑04 Sep 2019, 16:05Mercedes said on their youtube channel that the slipstream in Spa is worth about 0.3-0.5s. In Monza it obviously will be a lot more. I wouldn't be surprised if Monza quali turns into a total clusterf**k when everyone wants to get behind someone, and by the end of Q3 suddenly 2- 3 cars in the back decide they have to pass the cars in front or their session will be over before passing the finish line, and then of cause the cars in front their final Q3 lap will be completely f**ked. Parabolica, being a relatively fast corner, will only make it worse because you need some distance to build up the speed.
I bet this kind of quali slipstream ridiculousness will reach a new height next year.
Awesome news! It is my favorite track on the calendar
I didn't. You're reading way too much into this. Regardless of how VET performed, Ferrari was always going to get pole here with a clean lap. That was Toto's point.siskue2005 wrote: ↑04 Sep 2019, 18:25so why were you claiming this>>?mkay wrote: ↑04 Sep 2019, 17:27He didn't say specifically, but his comments implied that higher PU mode wouldn't have changed the outcome of qualifying.siskue2005 wrote: ↑04 Sep 2019, 15:37
Where did Toto say that a tenth or two is what their maximum engine mode is worth? Any link or sourceplease dont put your opinion as someone else's quote!The 0.5-0.6s gap would have been had HAM nailed his best sectors together (with lower PU mode). From Toto's comments, the engine mode would not have made a material difference (a tenth or two at most)
Loved how he cheekily asked Ferrari to kindly provide everyone else with a slipstream since they already have such a good top speed.yelistener wrote: ↑04 Sep 2019, 16:05Mercedes said on their youtube channel that the slipstream in Spa is worth about 0.3-0.5s. In Monza it obviously will be a lot more. I wouldn't be surprised if Monza quali turns into a total clusterf**k when everyone wants to get behind someone, and by the end of Q3 suddenly 2- 3 cars in the back decide they have to pass the cars in front or their session will be over before passing the finish line, and then of cause the cars in front their final Q3 lap will be completely f**ked. Parabolica, being a relatively fast corner, will only make it worse because you need some distance to build up the speed.
I bet this kind of quali slipstream ridiculousness will reach a new height next year.