Pup, welcome. What a great post.
I think most people agree on the "I like good losers" proposition. Very un-american, very european, extremely latino position. Who checks "same car performance" in NASCAR, like people do in F1 among teammates? Nobody.
About the glasses/Ritalin comparison, well, OK. It's worrying to find so many people with the same diagnosis in so few years, it reminds me of fashiont trends like "indigo kids" or something like that. You wonder if psychiatrists have at hand something to diagnose ADD that is equivalent to the thingie ophtalmologists use to diagnose myopia. When I read the cues to ADD diagnostics, I have the disease.
I don't take aspirin, much less Ritalin, I'm resigned to be myself (or maybe less than myself...
).
I also find funny the fact that drug companies advertise their products. Why on earth you have to advertise a drug for a heart contidion? Beats me. It's not like people is going to say: "Well, I saw the add and after three heart attacks they finally convinced me to take my medication". I think most people agrees that behind new drugs for mental conditions there is a lot of invested money expecting to be recovered.
I think this is a "very proper thread". WhiteBlue explains he is disturbed by the "mind enhancing" label. Me too, because I think is a
new label, a new problem racing has to deal with somehow, a disgusting but true label.
I had no idea of this kind of problem surging until I read a friend's post (Lawrence) in GP about "What drugs do the drivers take?". After reading for a while before posting in that thread, it dawned upon me that mind drugs have changed a lot, more than cars.
I definitely don't want them in racing: until now, racing has been a thing that depends on valiant people to drive magnificent cars. We all appreciate the efforts of backmarkers, knowing perfectly that the best driver in the worst car has no chance to win a cup, but he has a chance to win some hearts. No problem with that. Von Tripps or Schumacher? For me, both.