Maybe it makes sense to merge the cooling systems, it depends on the difference of the temperature between this two circuits.
Batteries need cooling too, i forgot.
Now, i'll go to sleep, its nearly 5am here
Regards
I think there is jet another (much simpler) way! Just make sure that the teams only use batteries (or flywheels) that can only store 60kW! That would encourage the teams to develop more efficient solutions (because if you transform electric energy to mechanical energy you always loose some)! + There is no need to monitor Torque and Rpm! + No Cheating!This makes my wonder, with all this cooling needed, the only reliable way for the FIA to police the 400kJ/60kW rule, will be to monitor Torque and Rpm in and out of the MGU, correct scarbs?
Very good read. Thanks for the link!Conceptual wrote:Lithium battery FAQ: http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showthread.php?t=209187
Maximum fuel pressure in the fuel rails is mandated and monitored by the FIA, teams are already at the maximum (100bar IIRC), so I doubt there’s a benefit. From what I’ve seen of the KERS and cars (including a Mac monocoque mould!) the KERS is totally external to the monocoque. The MGU sits where the bottom of the oil tank used to go, the battery and PCU sitting alongside the tub, by the rads.Conceptual wrote:I wonder if the battery being placed under the fuel tank may actually heat up the fuel, causing it to expand, and gain pressure in the fuel system.
I don't know if that would be a benefit or a hindrance, since you would think that colder fuel would give more power, but more pressure may outweigh the temperature increase.
Any ideas?
Apparently you have more than one balaclavaxpensive wrote:You should ask WB about that one pipex, he's a believer. I'm not.
I never knew there was so much info on these batteries! It fills like 10 pages at that link...ackzsel wrote:Very good read. Thanks for the link!Conceptual wrote:Lithium battery FAQ: http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showthread.php?t=209187
Check out the Williams web site for their new comany on KERS. It has a very informative grafic of the system.pipex wrote:Hi scarbs, do you have any information about the Williams KERS?
From what i know it uses a flywheel as a replacement for the batteries, and the system is electrical.
Thanks
I wonder... Is it possible that this is going to make it into F2 since Williams makes those chassis? Or would it have to come from Audi?WhiteBlue wrote:Check out the Williams web site for their new comany on KERS. It has a very informative grafic of the system.pipex wrote:Hi scarbs, do you have any information about the Williams KERS?
From what i know it uses a flywheel as a replacement for the batteries, and the system is electrical.
Thanks
http://www.williamshybridpower.com/technology/
There is also a very interesting Flash video of the F1 system.
lets see with what Williams come out. I'm not a believer but give them the benefit of doubtxpensive wrote:You should ask WB about that one pipex, he's a believer. I'm not.
Thanks WhiteBlue, I'll check it outWhiteBlue wrote:Check out the Williams web site for their new comany on KERS. (snip)