2014 Design

Here are our CFD links and discussions about aerodynamics, suspension, driver safety and tyres. Please stick to F1 on this forum.
User avatar
horse
6
Joined: 23 Oct 2009, 17:53
Location: Bilbao, ES

Re: 2014 Design

Post

OK, yes, I think I can see that it is implicit in having a major axis defined. That would eliminate any gurneys then.

There is the potential for a multi-element layout, but I'm not sure if it's beneficial with a limited AoA.

You might also be able to blow the sections, to try and get a blown flap.
"Words are for meaning: when you've got the meaning, you can forget the words." - Chuang Tzu

User avatar
turbof1
Moderator
Joined: 19 Jul 2012, 21:36
Location: MountDoom CFD Matrix

Re: 2014 Design

Post

Is it possible to put flaps on the gearbox that work in a multi-element way with the driveshaft aerofoil? is that possible and is that free from the max angle?
#AeroFrodo

User avatar
Blackout
1566
Joined: 09 Feb 2010, 04:12

Re: 2014 Design

Post

Is it possible to shape the gear box casing, the top rear part for example like a mini beam wing ? it cant be considered like a bodywork , it's the Gbox casing :mrgreen:

autogyro
autogyro
53
Joined: 04 Oct 2009, 15:03

Re: 2014 Design

Post

You could also make the gearbox casing hollow and make the gears with turbine blades on them.
You could then use the cokebottle shape to blow air over the diffuser.
Hmm, though of that in the 80s, think it was banned.
I wont even bother to try it today.

User avatar
andylaurence
123
Joined: 19 Jul 2011, 15:35

Re: 2014 Design

Post

Blackout wrote:Is it possible to shape the gear box casing, the top rear part for example like a mini beam wing ? it cant be considered like a bodywork , it's the Gbox casing :mrgreen:
I'm not sure about the F1 regs, but here's how the MSA define bodywork:
MSA wrote: Bodywork. All entirely sprung parts of the car in
contact with the external air stream, except the rollover
structures and the parts definitely associated with the
mechanical functioning of the engine, transmission and
running gear. Airboxes and radiators are considered to
be part of the bodywork. Exterior rear view mirrors are
not considered to be part of the bodywork. Bodywork
is differentiated as follows:
(a) Completely closed bodywork.
(b) Completely open bodywork
(c) Convertible bodywork with the hood in either
supple or rigid (hardtop) material.
That definition means it's all down to your interpretation of "definitely associated with the mechanical functioning". I'd suggest it's "associated with", but not "required for".

User avatar
horse
6
Joined: 23 Oct 2009, 17:53
Location: Bilbao, ES

Re: 2014 Design

Post

Interesting bit here from the BBC about Pirelli wanting to increase the tyre dimensions for next season. Apparently the teams already believe they will have greater power than expected and that the aerodynamic changes will not slow them significantly compared to this year.
Andrew Benson wrote: When the new rules for 2014 were introduced, it was expected the new design of engines would produce in the region of 750bhp, with 600bhp from the engine and turbo and 150bhp from enhanced energy recovery systems.

But the latest projections suggest the total power output could approach 850bhp, with as much as 700bhp produced by the engines and turbos alone.

That would mean power outputs about 70bhp greater than this season.

On top of that, the teams have been able to produce more aerodynamic downforce from the new chassis regulations than had been expected.

The new rules have greatly reduced the drag produced by the cars, so they can complete races with a new mandatory fuel restriction of no more than 100kg. Currently, there is no restriction and teams use about 140-150kg of fuel (about 210 litres) in a race.

The initial intention was to ensure the cars in 2014 would be no more than five seconds a lap slower than this year but the teams now believe cornering speeds will be only slightly down on this season.
From Pirelli pushing for wider tyres to be introduced for 2014 season
"Words are for meaning: when you've got the meaning, you can forget the words." - Chuang Tzu

User avatar
SectorOne
166
Joined: 26 May 2013, 09:51

Re: 2014 Design

Post

Some quotes from Scarbs.
Craig Scarborough ‏@ScarbsF1
Pirelli's calls for 20mm wider and 30mm taller rear tyres will have a huge impact on mechanical (gearbox\suspension) & aero design for 2014

One compromise for the Teams\Pirelli is to only go for 20mm wider tyres in 2014 and increase the rear max width to 1840mm
Also answered on the current tire widths which he thought was 340 and 380mm
So next year we are looking at 340-380mm then.
And if rim-size stays the same, about 15mm extra rubber on the rears i would presume?
"If the only thing keeping a person decent is the expectation of divine reward, then brother that person is a piece of sh*t"

User avatar
Holm86
247
Joined: 10 Feb 2010, 03:37
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark

Re: 2014 Design

Post

horse wrote:Interesting bit here from the BBC about Pirelli wanting to increase the tyre dimensions for next season. Apparently the teams already believe they will have greater power than expected and that the aerodynamic changes will not slow them significantly compared to this year.
Andrew Benson wrote: When the new rules for 2014 were introduced, it was expected the new design of engines would produce in the region of 750bhp, with 600bhp from the engine and turbo and 150bhp from enhanced energy recovery systems.

But the latest projections suggest the total power output could approach 850bhp, with as much as 700bhp produced by the engines and turbos alone.

That would mean power outputs about 70bhp greater than this season.

On top of that, the teams have been able to produce more aerodynamic downforce from the new chassis regulations than had been expected.

The new rules have greatly reduced the drag produced by the cars, so they can complete races with a new mandatory fuel restriction of no more than 100kg. Currently, there is no restriction and teams use about 140-150kg of fuel (about 210 litres) in a race.

The initial intention was to ensure the cars in 2014 would be no more than five seconds a lap slower than this year but the teams now believe cornering speeds will be only slightly down on this season.
From Pirelli pushing for wider tyres to be introduced for 2014 season
It will be exciting to see where they have found this downforce. IMO the regulations looks to shed a quite substantial amount of downforce. The beamwing is gone. It produces a great amount of downforce in itself. Other than that it also helps with extracting air from the diffuser. This means diffusers will be slightly less effective as well. The rear wings will also be shallower. Again removing a lot of rear downforce. The front wings are slightly narrower which in it self doesn't decrease downforce that much. But because of the large reduction in rear downforce they will run lower AoA on the front wings to bring back the aero balance. So the overall DF level will be reduced a lot IMO.

User avatar
WhiteBlue
92
Joined: 14 Apr 2008, 20:58
Location: WhiteBlue Country

Re: 2014 Design

Post

Racecar Engineering wrote:If indeed F1 suddenly ... does a deal with Michelin then the French firm would almost certainly demand 18 inch wheel rims, which it already has a family of tyres to suit, used in LMP1, meaning that the tyres will have much lower profiles.

Mercedes has reportedly already called for a switch to wider rims to deal with the additional torque generated by the 2014 power units. Some figures such as Ferrari’s James Allison refuse to accept that Michelin could be ready for 2014, but others such as Nigel Stepney insist that the deal is already done. So perhaps the tyres will still dominate talk in the paddock in the second half of the year but for very different reasons.
You can expect Red Bull and Mercedes to go against Ferrari in the issue. Michelin will have massive experience from LMP1 with high torque from the Audi diesels and 18 inch rims and will take up the slack in no time to produce F1 tyres. We could face a very lively discussion if the 18 inch rim issue returns through the Michelin back door. Suspension design will be up in the air and everybody will go back to the drawing board. Perhaps a FRIC will be even more valuable?
Formula One's fundamental ethos is about success coming to those with the most ingenious engineering and best .............................. organization, not to those with the biggest budget. (Dave Richards)

trinidefender
trinidefender
317
Joined: 19 Apr 2013, 20:37

Re: 2014 Design

Post

Not sure if this has been mentioned but for 2014 I expect we will see more designs with more airflow going around the sides of the sidepods rather than over them. Simply because many teams are trying to get as much airflow over the sidpods to push the exhaust flow down to the floor. In 2014 there will be no exhausts like that so therefore no need to have all that flow there. Secondly, with how most teams sidepods are currently shaped, they almost act like a a wing with a low pressure area on top of the sidepods. This was offset by the benefits of helping the exhaust flow get down to the ground.

User avatar
gary123
14
Joined: 12 Jan 2013, 20:49
Location: Italy

Re: 2014 Design

Post

WhiteBlue wrote:
Racecar Engineering wrote:If indeed F1 suddenly ... does a deal with Michelin then the French firm would almost certainly demand 18 inch wheel rims, which it already has a family of tyres to suit, used in LMP1, meaning that the tyres will have much lower profiles.

Mercedes has reportedly already called for a switch to wider rims to deal with the additional torque generated by the 2014 power units. Some figures such as Ferrari’s James Allison refuse to accept that Michelin could be ready for 2014, but others such as Nigel Stepney insist that the deal is already done. So perhaps the tyres will still dominate talk in the paddock in the second half of the year but for very different reasons.
You can expect Red Bull and Mercedes to go against Ferrari in the issue. Michelin will have massive experience from LMP1 with high torque from the Audi diesels and 18 inch rims and will take up the slack in no time to produce F1 tyres. We could face a very lively discussion if the 18 inch rim issue returns through the Michelin back door. Suspension design will be up in the air and everybody will go back to the drawing board. Perhaps a FRIC will be even more valuable?
I think that for next year it will change nothing. during the last gp weekend the italian press said that pirelli wanted to make bigger tires at the rear but some teams didnt agree with them beacuse their projects are in advance status and this would cause huge problems.
But for 2015 every thing cuold change, Michelin could come back in F1 and we could se bigger wheels :)

User avatar
WhiteBlue
92
Joined: 14 Apr 2008, 20:58
Location: WhiteBlue Country

Re: 2014 Design

Post

gary123 wrote:I think that for next year it will change nothing. during the last gp weekend the italian press said that pirelli wanted to make bigger tires at the rear but some teams didnt agree with them beacuse their projects are in advance status and this would cause huge problems.
But for 2015 every thing cuold change, Michelin could come back in F1 and we could se bigger wheels :)
I don't think this is the whole story. We are dealing with two different proposals. Pirelli proposed some time ago to go to wider tires. But Michelin and Mercedes think the tyres need bigger rims or a lower profile to be safe.

If the safety argument is made to stick Todt can force the low profile tyres whether the teams like them or not. He can tell them to use the Michelin low profile tyres because the Pirelli high profile are not safe enough. The teams have no remedy to such a decision by the FiA. All Todt needs is a spec by Pirelli and expert evidence that such a spec would be unsafe. I think his friends @ Michelin will provide Mr. Todt with sufficient addresses of experts that will testify to that result. Just a nice little conspiracy theory but one that is not totally unlikely.

There is precedence in F1 history. Remember the grooved tyres. The FiA under Max Mosley was looking for ways to curb performance because cornering speeds were deemed dangerously high. Some tyre companies suggested a reduction in contact patch. So eventually Max forced the grooved tyre although the teams were dead against them. Eventually they had to use them because safety was invoked. Same game today but for a different agenda.
Formula One's fundamental ethos is about success coming to those with the most ingenious engineering and best .............................. organization, not to those with the biggest budget. (Dave Richards)

Huntresa
Huntresa
54
Joined: 03 Dec 2011, 11:33

Re: 2014 Design

Post

Just watched Scarbs on The Racers Edge, and he said the FW will just be 1.5cm shorter on each side, i thought it would be 7 or 7.5 on each side ?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=p ... LXY&t=1738

About 5 seconds in he says it.

astracrazy
astracrazy
31
Joined: 04 Mar 2009, 16:04

Re: 2014 Design

Post

trinidefender wrote:Not sure if this has been mentioned but for 2014 I expect we will see more designs with more airflow going around the sides of the sidepods rather than over them. Simply because many teams are trying to get as much airflow over the sidpods to push the exhaust flow down to the floor. In 2014 there will be no exhausts like that so therefore no need to have all that flow there.
i don't think that will make any difference. What about 2009, 2010 and 2011? You'll always get directed flow over the sidepods no matter what anyway. The wake of the front wing sends the flow upwards which will go over the top of the sidepods.

I think they will just slope the sidepods towards the floor/diffuser even more to try and bring that flow down (perhaps like the mp4-25 http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/c ... actice.jpg)

+ the low noses will send flow over the nose rather than under it
Last edited by astracrazy on 30 Jul 2013, 10:57, edited 1 time in total.

astracrazy
astracrazy
31
Joined: 04 Mar 2009, 16:04

Re: 2014 Design

Post

Huntresa wrote:Just watched Scarbs on The Racers Edge, and he said the FW will just be 1.5cm shorter on each side, i thought it would be 7 or 7.5 on each side ?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=p ... LXY&t=1738

About 5 seconds in he says it.
its def 75mm