Ray wrote:You obviously are way off base. Yes it's a sport, yes you don't have to participate. But with your totally backwards way of looking at it, not commenting would make you immediately guilty...
I don't really think so. Sports run their own sporting laws. They commonly contain regulations which would violate normal human rights in everyday life almost globally. They also often assume guilt for any evasive or delaying tactics - putting the onus on competitors to comply. I don't see why people are essentially debating that F1 should conduct their affairs more like corporate law than as a sporting body.
Some examples.
Athletics - all female athletes who wish to compete in the Olympics must undergo a gender test. (One notable exception was made in the case of Princess Anne for the 1984 L.A. Olympics where she competed in equestrian)
Athletics - all athletes who wish to compete in any sanctioned even accept the obligation to submit to a drugs test with almost zero notice. Failure to comply in most circumstances results in the test being deemed a 'fail' - not a 'no result'.
Horse riding - most countries subject mounts to drugs testing. Failure to supply enough urine for the test before the player leaves the race-track is deemed a refusal. (a major court case in NZ concerning one of Australasia's most successful jockeys, Lisa Cropp, attempts to have her failed drugs test void on the grounds it breached her basic human rights was ultimately rejected at the highest level of Australasian law)
NRL in Australia/NZ - players subject to (outside of game) assault charges or drugs are stood down from playing until the resolution of the court case or satisfaction - at the discretion of the NRL - that the charges are minor or wont succeed. The player has no right of recourse over the NRL (well, if he ever wishes to play again
).
Etc.
Ray wrote:WTF is with you people? Guilty until proven innocent seems to be the majority around here.
Others may have but I didn't actually say that. The key issue of my point was that allowing what some would deem
human rights - if applied in F1 - would serve only to slow down process unnecessarily, add extra costs and delay results which could prejudice other competitors.