But it still broke :/Sasha wrote:The new intake parts will be ready for next weeks test. So they are planning to turn the wick up.The first test the PU was detune alot.
@goranf1 What's your source?????GoranF1 wrote:I think the engine you refere to will be modyfied so that it could be fited by race 11 or 12 this year.....or so i hear.erikejw wrote:Bence wrote:For the Skunkworks/Old Boys Engine, it's still better this way, as it is easier to find reliability than outright performance.
Maybe the Old Boys engine could not be fitted in the McLaren car due to different parts at new places so the dimensions is wrong. The 2017 engine will probably be based on that one. Where does that leave the 2016 engine when it comes to upgrades?
whit Honda runing detuned performance due to electrical problems whit intake.tom101 wrote:http://www.laf1.es/noticias/mercedes-es ... aga-918208
Speculation:
Mercedes:950hp
Ferrari: 930
Renault: 900
Honda: 850
Can't be accurate. The gulf between 900 and 950 peak horsepower would not be so noticeable on track due to the nature of the engines. Common sense says Renault hasn't cracked 900hp yet because that would mean they have finally solved 90% of the issues, and they haven't!tom101 wrote:http://www.laf1.es/noticias/mercedes-es ... aga-918208
Speculation:
Mercedes:950hp
Ferrari: 930
Renault: 900
Honda: 850
I would say that it means that they slightly compromised on some of the packaging to increase PU performance. But, I know jack sh!t, so take that for what it's worth.davidfroshanzen wrote:After the issue of a hydraulic leak on the previous day, the team decided – as a precaution – to replace the power unit overnight. After three laps, the data flagged a coolant leak. It was the start of a frustrating day for Alonso, cutting short his track time, but it hasn’t dampened the team's spirit. Testing has enabled a sizeable amount of valuable integration, evaluation and correlation of our new package’s components. ERS deployment has been improved and we know much more about the balance between the power unit and the chassis.
http://en.hondaracingf1.com/#sthash.W374BnB1.dpuf
does anyone know the words mean(bold) ???
Tbh we won't really know the relative performance of the Honda PU against the others until the first race when the gloves are off. No point being overly pessimistic at this stage, as testing is just that testing - Working on aero, tyres, finding reliability issues - work on fixes and testing various different maps for the PU and maybe new fuel mixtures and lubricants.PlatinumZealot wrote:Can't be accurate. The gulf between 900 and 950 peak horsepower would not be so noticeable on track due to the nature of the engines. Common sense says Renault hasn't cracked 900hp yet because that would mean they have finally solved 90% of the issues, and they haven't!tom101 wrote:http://www.laf1.es/noticias/mercedes-es ... aga-918208
Speculation:
Mercedes:950hp
Ferrari: 930
Renault: 900
Honda: 850
Andres125sx wrote:And they do, but as you probably know, no simulation tool can replace real world testingFW17 wrote:Joseki wrote:
Honda have both as far as I know.
So they should be using it.
Specially when past season your simulation tools proved to be unreliable
Can you copy/paste that data here...i cant find it on the link, it say keine meserung in Mclaren sectionamho wrote:In Renault v6 forum speed of cars through sector lines is published & Mclaren has 6th & 4th fastest speed through 1st & 2nd sectors and if u compare their speed to 2015 qualifying u will see a considerable improvement while their current top speed even doesn't match first Barcelona test in 2015 so they have improved but they don't push the engine in the main straight line to save engine and gain data.
.http://www.f1technical.net/forum/viewto ... &start=660" target="_blank" target="_blank