A-Bap wrote:jknights wrote:Wynters wrote:Hamilton had got out and was pushing his car around by hand and Vettel still only barely managed to catch them (the rest couldn't even stay within touching distance of the Mercs). Given how much life he would have had left in his tyres, fuel reserves for high-performance engine modes and the normal advantage the Merc has over the Ferrari I don't see how Vettel would have passed him.
nThere wasn't even a realistic chance that Vettel would pass Rosberg.
I think Mercedes main concern was for internal team harmony. If, for instance, Hamilton backed Rosberg into Verstappen and there was a race-ending collision as a result I can't see how the Rosberg/Hamilton relationship survives. That, in turn, splits the Mercedes team as a whole as people will take sides.
Exactly.
Mercedes are German, and so is Rosberg. They think it is good for company prestige to have WDC as a German. This is probably correct.
I actually think that Hamilton has been unlucky this year but Rosberg has driven consistently if not spectularly and so deserves his WDC.
Next year is a new specification for all the cars. This will be interesting in theory but we shall see.
What do we think about the possibility that Mercedes needed the 1-2 to qualify for an ongoing increase in their Heritage Bonus? Or perhaps something else. I think its certainly a plausible explanation as to why the team orders were so strong.
Ugh this is even beneath usual level here
- "Team orders because Rosberg is German" What team orders? To not slow down too much and cause collision and/or allow Vettel to jump one or two Merc cars = lose win. Didn't stop Hamilton did it? Did he win 'despite' 'team orders'? Count of TO is 3:0. Shame on pure racer and German Mercedes.
- "No realistic chance for Vettel to pass" A. Tell that to Hamilton. B. Not obvious C. Depends on what you consider realistic, see above. Realistic = Hamilton was capable of doing infinite amount of dumb things after slowing down pseudo tactic display.
- " Rosberg has driven consistently if not spectacularly and so deserves his WDC." Throwing a bone of backhanded compliments are we? No, he didn't spectacularly crash and Q 10th in the car quicker 0,7 than nearest competitor in Baku. Didn't spectacularly crash into team-mate in Spain losing Merc 1-2. Didn't spectacularly get a gift of Monaco win through team orders and 10 s pitstop. Instead disgusting consistency of dominant wins (Italy. Singapore, Japan, Baku) and BS penalties (no luck involved).
Didn't have as many spectacularly bad starts like Italy. These incurable/hardware software problems that were magically solved in the last ~5 races which suggest that the problem was the driver = Hamilton. Can't be bothered with the rest.
Anyway:
- How was Palmer's driving into back of a car a 5 s penalty
? That was worse than most 10 s penalties this season including Rosberg vs Ham (Austria) and of course vs Raikkonen in Malaysia or Nasr Palmer. They're not even trying to pretend.
- Palmer is the new Button, anyone close to him gets penalties while he gets away. That was a drive through.