True, even in LMP (completely closed cockpit) they all wear fully closed helmetsdjos wrote:They would still risk getting dust and debris in their eyes in a crash so not going to happen ringo.
True, even in LMP (completely closed cockpit) they all wear fully closed helmetsdjos wrote:They would still risk getting dust and debris in their eyes in a crash so not going to happen ringo.
I think they are concerned about visibility where the track is undulating, eg Spa and the driver has to look upwards from his seating position.WaikeCU wrote:I think the idea is alright, but the aeroscreen atm is a bit too high. It would be better aesthetically if the height of the aeroscreen would be similar height as the stepped headrest, but then it doesn't cover the full front of the driver's head.
Apparently the windscreen has enough of an impact on performance that RBR didn't want to finish FP1 with it. Any thoughts on whether constructors could redesign parts of the car to get around the performance impact? Or will everyone simply need to accept that cars with windscreens will be slower?F1Tec hnical wrote:Red Bull's Ricciardo slotted in just behind after the team removed the windscreen and reverted the car to its race specification.
Or, relax the rules and give sponsors the ability to sponsor just a single car if they want to.Steven wrote:I would also combine the introduction of this system with a minimum size car number, given that we'll see the helmets even less.
Perhaps the frame could be coloured with driver helmet colours to improve recognition as well.
#aerogollumturbof1 wrote: YOU SHALL NOT......STALLLLL!!!
Red Bull also said well in advance that they would only run it for the instal lap.Thunders wrote:@notsofast: According to Red Bull it affected Cooling and fresh Air Feed to the Engine to much as to run it for the whole FP1. Cars are just not designed for it yet.
What are you talking about? There isn't a single negative vote in the last 4 pages.stefan_ wrote:It would be nice if we can give pertinent oppinions about not agreeing with someone rather than a blank, negative vote.
But that's the level, I understand.
Hamilton said in the same article (apparently) that a complete fighter style closed cockpit would be better but the halo was no good because Alonso couldn't have got out of his car.Webber2011 wrote:I like it a lot more than anything else that's been presented so far.
Hamilton's "riot shield" comment is valid to me though, because it does look a little like one.
The first thing that I noticed was the way the screen is held to the frame.
Great big bolts that really stand out, and in my mind make it look quite primitive compared to the rest of a F1 car.
Even something as simple as having those bolts coloured black would be much more pleasing to the eye.
I know this is a very small detail, but when I picture it, I feel it would make a big difference.