Exactly. I like RIC, but this was poorly judged and executed. It looked desperate...LionKing wrote:Nobody saying about it is wrong to try to overtake. It was a BAD overtaking move. We are lucky that they did not both go out in a T-bone.ChrisM40 wrote:I cant believe anyone is criticising RIC for trying to overtake! It wasn't dangerous, it wasnt against the rules, it was exactly what I wish MORE drivers would do. Seriously, people moan about boring races then criticise a driver for attempting an entertaining overtake. Maybe they should just stop watching..
I think HAM had the right setting. You'd want to be on max. harvesting on the formation lap and then full beans for the first lap. Nico certainly went to change it once he realised which would imply fault?GPR-A wrote:Aha... just saw Anthony Hamilton's sky pad analysis of the Mercedes incident. Rosberg, started with a different setting than Lewis. Lewis was using the same setting that Nico was using in Sochi, which Anthony says is the right setting, but Rosberg was on a setting that took him to harvesting mode on turn 3 (his light was flashing, with power going down) and then, instead of looking at the mirrors, he was looking at his Steering wheel to change the setting back and by the time he realize, Lewis was next to him, who was using the right settings.
So explain why Ricciardo couldnt pass vettel with a car with fresher tires that was faster at that point in the race..... the only option was making a desperate attempt like ricciardo tried with vettel.... you are way off base with the kimi comments...iotar__ wrote:Bunch of mediocrity leading and Hamilton ruining Rosberg's win. If you expected exciting racing - you should know better:
- Ricciardo - losing Barcelona from the lead - quite an achievement. Anyone still thinks he's a top driver? Plus trade mark: dive, outbrake yourself & collision attempt.
- Verstappen - drove in circles at his own pace, "option" strategy worked and he had a driver behind in a (slightly) quicker Ferrari that should not be in F1. Yesterday losing fifth-eighth places in Toro Ross and now suddenly leading races. A miracle transition of F1 A.D '16 - the blind leading the lame.
It was not the changing of the setting, it was not seeing in the mirror and a car next to his and simply closing the door, is the problem.domh245 wrote:I think HAM had the right setting. You'd want to be on max. harvesting on the formation lap and then full beans for the first lap. Nico certainly went to change it once he realised which would imply fault?GPR-A wrote:Aha... just saw Anthony Hamilton's sky pad analysis of the Mercedes incident. Rosberg, started with a different setting than Lewis. Lewis was using the same setting that Nico was using in Sochi, which Anthony says is the right setting, but Rosberg was on a setting that took him to harvesting mode on turn 3 (his light was flashing, with power going down) and then, instead of looking at the mirrors, he was looking at his Steering wheel to change the setting back and by the time he realize, Lewis was next to him, who was using the right settings.
Sure? When Marco talked to Seb before the podium he was also surprised, that the strategy did not work.GrayGreat wrote:
Your team RedBull**** gave their lead driver the worse strategy....
It was not the changing of the setting, it was not seeing in the mirror and a car next to his and simply closing the door, is the problem.[/quote]GPR-A wrote:
I think HAM had the right setting. You'd want to be on max. harvesting on the formation lap and then full beans for the first lap. Nico certainly went to change it once he realised which would imply fault?
It looked indeed somewhere between optimistic and desperate. But these dive bomb attacks are bit of his trademark. This time it was messed up a bit though so it openly looked like a dive bomb. He was indeed lucky that Vettel was alert and avoided the collision. I don't blame Daniel for launching such an attack, though. Was just not one of his best moves. Possibly, seeing Max running to the win was somewhere nagging on his mind as well.zeph wrote: Exactly. I like RIC, but this was poorly judged and executed. It looked desperate...