Adding more downforce would hurt top speeds more than it would acceleration surely. With more downforce you can exit corners faster and put the power down harder which both help the initial acceleration.LM10 wrote: ↑03 Nov 2019, 11:04Yea, yesterday I wrote the same regarding finish line speed which is what really matters as it tells us something about acceleration which still was siginificantly better than others.MtthsMlw wrote: ↑03 Nov 2019, 10:35Or they put some more downforce on the car, just like they did in Mexico where they also gained less on the straight on Saturday than on Friday.zibby43 wrote: ↑03 Nov 2019, 06:21After the PU-related Technical Directive was issued, Ferrari's straightline speed advantage was halved, per GPS measurements (AMuS).
Marko: "Our top speed deficit to Ferrari was not so bad [in qualifying]. On the long straight, it was three to four tenths. Yesterday we lost twice that. "
AMuS:
"In the GPS comparisons shows that Ferrari wins in Austin on all straights together three and a half tenths to the Mercedes and six tenths to the Red Bull Honda. That's about half of what was measured the previous day. And half of the Ferrari advantage in Suzuka, a circuit similar to the Circuit of the Americas."
Finish line speed trap still shows the usual picture of Ferrari accelerating faster than anyone else. Also their top speed on every straight is still a couple of kmh higher than that of Merc or RB.
More downforce is a pretty realistic reason for the less gain on the straights compared to Friday. In S3 Ferrari was as fast as Mercedes. Only Verstappen was a tenth up.
It would be interesting to know the difference in top speeds across all 4 sessions so far.