McLaren MP4-12C

Breaking news, useful data or technical highlights or vehicles that are not meant to race. You can post commercial vehicle news or developments here.
Please post topics on racing variants in "other racing categories".
marcush.
marcush.
159
Joined: 09 Mar 2004, 16:55

Re: McLaren MP4-12C

Post

I have to admit that I like the 12point bolt head ..but :
you need really design the application to it = need enough acess to be able to use a socket....all conventional open spanners ...no ways to use those..and you need top class tools because of the reduced head size as well...
Inside hex and especiallycombined with countersunk head very likely to be misused by spannermans of this world... :roll: at least the old trick with a torx bit hammered into the rounded off inside hex will usually do the trick to crack them open....
I´m a definite fan of torx .

Giblet
Giblet
5
Joined: 19 Mar 2007, 01:47
Location: Canada

Re: McLaren MP4-12C

Post

Maybe it's time for a dedicated "I love bolts" thread.
Before I do anything I ask myself “Would an idiot do that?” And if the answer is yes, I do not do that thing. - Dwight Schrute

Formula None
Formula None
1
Joined: 17 Nov 2010, 05:23

Re: McLaren MP4-12C

Post

Why? This McLaren is supposed to be quite the driver's car.

Giblet
Giblet
5
Joined: 19 Mar 2007, 01:47
Location: Canada

Re: McLaren MP4-12C

Post

I lol'd.
Before I do anything I ask myself “Would an idiot do that?” And if the answer is yes, I do not do that thing. - Dwight Schrute

autogyro
autogyro
53
Joined: 04 Oct 2009, 15:03

Re: McLaren MP4-12C

Post

I prefer love handles but some are into nuts I understand.
Just been told to eat my dinner or someone else will.
lol

Formula None
Formula None
1
Joined: 17 Nov 2010, 05:23

Re: McLaren MP4-12C

Post

That's screwed up, autogyro. This thread is getting a little too coarse for me. In fact, this thread should be locked to prevent any more flatheaded comments.

User avatar
humble sabot
27
Joined: 17 Feb 2007, 10:33

Re: McLaren MP4-12C

Post

Formula None, you have hereby been banned for too many puns in a two line post
the four immutable forces:
static balance
dynamic balance
static imbalance
dynamic imbalance

Caito
Caito
13
Joined: 16 Jun 2009, 05:30
Location: Switzerland

Re: McLaren MP4-12C

Post

When you refer to 12 point, which of them? I know there's a 3ple square(90 degree angles) double hex(60 degree angles, which I believe is bad for high torque) and splined one.
Come back 747, we miss you!!

User avatar
humble sabot
27
Joined: 17 Feb 2007, 10:33

Re: McLaren MP4-12C

Post

Image
the four immutable forces:
static balance
dynamic balance
static imbalance
dynamic imbalance

Richied76
Richied76
0
Joined: 18 Aug 2010, 21:04

Re: McLaren MP4-12C

Post


mx_tifoso
mx_tifoso
0
Joined: 30 Nov 2006, 05:01
Location: North America

Re: McLaren MP4-12C

Post

If this model is a V8, will they follow the norm and use a V10 or V12 for their flagship?
Forum guide: read before posting

"You do it, then it's done." - Kimi Räikkönen

Por las buenas soy amigo, por las malas soy campeón.

User avatar
JohnsonsEvilTwin
0
Joined: 29 Jan 2010, 11:51
Location: SU 419113

Re: McLaren MP4-12C

Post

Not if their lightweight philosophy holds true.

I think boosting the current V8 would be a much better and cheaper option rather than develop another engine from scratch.
More could have been done.
David Purley

User avatar
WhiteBlue
92
Joined: 14 Apr 2008, 20:58
Location: WhiteBlue Country

Re: McLaren MP4-12C

Post

mx_tifosi wrote:If this model is a V8, will they follow the norm and use a V10 or V12 for their flagship?
I very much doubt that. The current engine is a fuel optimized turbo V8. McLaren are already committed to a hybrid. I don't think they will increase the cylinder count for comfort and prestige and reduce efficiency by doing that. It is not going to improve performance or weight.

If McLaren do their own 2013 F1 engine I can see them doing an L4 in one of their road cars. That would make sense in terms of a marketing message.
Formula One's fundamental ethos is about success coming to those with the most ingenious engineering and best .............................. organization, not to those with the biggest budget. (Dave Richards)

User avatar
Tim.Wright
330
Joined: 13 Feb 2009, 06:29

Re: McLaren MP4-12C

Post

I thought this thread was about fasteners?

Tim
Not the engineer at Force India

User avatar
Pandamasque
17
Joined: 09 Nov 2009, 17:28
Location: Kyiv, Ukraine

Re: McLaren MP4-12C

Post

WhiteBlue wrote:
mx_tifosi wrote:If this model is a V8, will they follow the norm and use a V10 or V12 for their flagship?
I very much doubt that. The current engine is a fuel optimized turbo V8. McLaren are already committed to a hybrid. I don't think they will increase the cylinder count for comfort and prestige and reduce efficiency by doing that. It is not going to improve performance or weight.
What about racing? There wasn't a remotely successful forced induction car in FIA/ACO GT classes for ages. Even Nismo ditched their V6 Turbo in favour of the N/A V8 from some other Nissan for GT-R GT1.

McLaren seem to have been very serious about their GTE programme. Many see their lobby as the main reason ACO allowed carbon monocoques for 2011. A normally aspirated 3.8L V8 would have to work very hard to keep up with the opposition. Even AMR/Prodrive are thinking about replacing their 4.5L V8 by a bigger V12 in the Vantage just for durability.