Perhaps they took a chance and at the end of the race they turned the engine into a more powerful mode. It looks like Lando's tires were in good condition as well.
Not as much as usual. They were being cautious after Carlos's PU failure. They let him use Scenario-7 but only for a little bit after several warnings about not using it. The tire deg was probably the most crucial factor.
As far as I know, downforce isn't very significant on low-speed corners (unless you have a blown diffuser) because you aren't going that fast. It's mostly down to the mechanical grip. Suspension layout and behavior should play a bigger role. They must come up with some clever hydraulic tricks to help shift the car weight according to the corner.Ground Effect wrote: ↑31 Aug 2020, 12:41I really hope McLaren have something in the pipeline to sort out the low speed issue. Like Lando mentioned, even in their low downforce config, Renault are still good in the low speed corners.
Maybe they shouldn't have given up on POU?Emag wrote: ↑31 Aug 2020, 12:48As far as I know, downforce isn't very significant on low-speed corners (unless you have a blown diffuser) because you aren't going that fast. It's mostly down to the mechanical grip. Suspension layout and behavior should play a bigger role. They must come up with some clever hydraulic tricks to help shift the car weight according to the corner.
CjC wrote: ↑31 Aug 2020, 09:13I read this on Friday:
Andrea Stella, Racing Director
“We’ve had a productive Friday. The rain that was expected at some stage didn’t show up, so we were able to run consistently with both cars and get through the programme. Today, that involved assessing some aerodynamic and mechanical parts being introduced at this race, and, of course, understanding the tyres – in case it’s a dry race.’’
https://www.formula1.com/en/latest/arti ... NlfPf.html
Does anyone have any idea what these mechanical parts might be? As we are aware it’s this side of the chassis we are lagging behind now but during the race at Spa I would say we had good tyre life at the end of the stint compared to TP but not necessarily Renault though (who I don’t support by the way).
Mechanical updates are usually very hard to spotCjC wrote:Also another drawback to all this Covid 19 social distancing that’s going on- we don’t have the eagle eyed journos in the pit lane spotting updates on the cars it’s most noticeable when there’s ‘mechanical updates’ on the car and there’s no one/ picture to show us. Has anyone notice this too?
It makes sense but Ocon had said in an interview prior to the race, that the main issue with the Renault is the amount of drag required for their downforce. I was surprised by the pace of the Renaults but would like to think that if we didn't have the engine issues we had the pace to finish ahead.Big Tea wrote: ↑31 Aug 2020, 13:52Don't know what can be taken from these results or performances as half the field were preparing for rain in some form and the other half winding off as much they could get away with and still get around the corners.
Renault looked a far better car than Mclaren, but had even light rain fallen I feel sure the Mclaren would have easily overhauled them, even if they managed to stay on track.
I don't think much can be made of it without including the setup.
Speed = Danny Ric 312.6 and Norris 310.8 and Ric 234.3 to Nor 234.4 at the finish line. Ric obviously more slippery at higher speed.
Rp seems to have more raw speed but it looks like they struugle with setup to unlock itwillmesquita wrote: ↑31 Aug 2020, 16:38MCL35 is a much more balanced car than Renault's and RP's cars. Goes well in high and low downforce tracks and keep scoring.
I have confidence we'll outscore them and be WCC P3.