Sour grapes. Sounds like you're having some as well.markn93 wrote:Thanks for that, what's he having for tea as you know him so intricately?Pierce89 wrote:You may not be too concerned, but I guarentee Lewis is.markn93 wrote: His record here is basically win or dnf, so not that surprising sadly. I think he can pull off a Vettelesque dominant streak to end the season, so am not too concerned. He prefers being the hunter and he's come back from a bigger deficit already this year.
Not really managed it better - instead *knew* to manage it better. Hamilton's problem was instantly catastrophic, and that gave rosberg the information that he needed to manage it.Pierce89 wrote:To be fair Rosberg had the same problem as Hami, but he seemingly managed it better.JimClarkFan wrote:This is why, as posted in another thread, some of us feel that the best 17 out of 20 races should make up the championship. So far the only reason why Lewis is not first is because of mechanical problems with his car.dans79 wrote:Thoroughly pissed about Lewis......
Hamilton was looking to pass before his rear brake exploded, he was managing it better (not that we know the exact severity for each driver)Pierce89 wrote: To be fair Rosberg had the same problem as Hami, but he seemingly managed it better.
I think that's called clear air that helps cool the breaks!Pierce89 wrote:To be fair Rosberg had the same problem as Hami, but he seemingly managed it better.JimClarkFan wrote:This is why, as posted in another thread, some of us feel that the best 17 out of 20 races should make up the championship. So far the only reason why Lewis is not first is because of mechanical problems with his car.dans79 wrote:Thoroughly pissed about Lewis......
Daniel drove a great race, but he jumped Vettel in the pits after making up 7 seconds before that because the Red Bull has no top speed. Vettel will certainly not like that, but performance-wise, it won't keep him awake.Pierce89 wrote:My guess: Vettel won't like it that Ricci beat him to Red Bull's first win. Especially since Ricci had to pass Vettel to do it.
Hamilton *was in front*. The problem likely developed right after he came out in the lead, then had less braking power at the hairpin which is where rosberg passed him - the cleaner exit gave Hamilton a better run up the straight, which is how he got back alongside Rosberg, but then the brakes seemed to go completely.oT v1 wrote:Hamilton was looking to pass before his rear brake exploded, he was managing it better (not that we know the exact severity for each driver)Pierce89 wrote: To be fair Rosberg had the same problem as Hami, but he seemingly managed it better.
Ham probably slightly harder on breaks, but he got the rough end of the stick... again. I kind of feel sorry for him, and then I remember he is a multi millionaire racing driver and I think... who caresPierce89 wrote:To be fair Rosberg had the same problem as Hami, but he seemingly managed it better.JimClarkFan wrote:This is why, as posted in another thread, some of us feel that the best 17 out of 20 races should make up the championship. So far the only reason why Lewis is not first is because of mechanical problems with his car.dans79 wrote:Thoroughly pissed about Lewis......
Labelling others is not good way of arguing. To answer the question: by going off track and gaining an advantage. Simple enough? Imagine Hamilton copying his move - would he have ended closer to Rosberg doing that and thus having better chance for overtake? Yes. The fact that he cut the corner when no one forced him wide, all by himself should count against him not for, it was de-facto duel, LH was close enough. Result -> shorter route, bigger gap -> gain.Pierce89 wrote: How did Rosberg push the boundaries of fairness? I don't know you personally, but this post comes off as an unhappy one of Hami's fannboizz. I'm not saying you are a Lewis fan boy, but it seems like a lack of a Hamilton win was the only thing that's "unsatisfying"
This is a joke right? Massa was the fastest car trough the speed traps. Short/long gears play no role.NathanOlder wrote:I think Massa would have flew by Vettel if the Williams had some longer gears
Agreed on the advantage gained, they forgot about DRS :s Dont agree on Massa, watch the replays again, you can see Perez turn the wheel left into Massa's path, i doubt Massa will get a penalty at alliotar__ wrote:Yes. The fact that he cut the corner when no one forced him wide, all by himself should count against him not for, it was de-facto duel, LH was close enough. Result -> shorter route, bigger gap -> gain.
So let's add another example of leaving the track and gaining an advantage that was worse than Grosjean-Hungary and remarkably wasn't penalised. Remember: rules are rules, once 4 wheels off the track = penalty, no questions asked. All experts agreed.
Speaking of hypocrisy: - Massa is one, as is the whole Williams team, I expect apologies.
It builds up: too small brake disks with the brake ducts nearly completely not used anymore for cooling, and big braking zones, will build up the temperature right until the breaking point. The pitstop inbetween allowed for a short moment to cool down.mnmracer wrote:Considering the Mercedes' were already managing the problem for quite some laps, I'm curious what exactly triggered the fatal issue.
Well, the issue seems to be that the MGU-K failed. They weren't so much managing it, as trying to figure out how to turn it back on. Once the MGU-K has failed, the rear brakes are doing all the work, instead of the MGU-K, and that inevitably leads to them getting much much hotter.mnmracer wrote:Considering the Mercedes' were already managing the problem for quite some laps, I'm curious what exactly triggered the fatal issue.