variante wrote:Welcome, Letouze!
A little infographic about the race:
http://i1372.photobucket.com/albums/ag3 ... ls189u.png
It's interesting to see how the situation is still messed up: top lift values are not concentrated on the podium, only CAEdevice managed to get 100% of the power (closely followed only by HP), and CoPs are still waaay out of the ideal value (during the last KVRC almost all the entries had values close to the ideal one).
So, I feel like we should have started with a non awarding point race to test the new software. On the other hand, the championship will be funnier because of this very same reason.
On my side, I experienced a severe loss of performance in comparison with the OCCFD software; about 20% downforce loss, mostly focused on the rear axle (minus 32% there...). Rear losses are probably due to near wall mesh improvements, which enhance boudary layer growth and consequent chain reactions. My very aggressive rear wing didn't help by that point of view.
In general, I have to say that I'm mostly scared by JJR, who has already a very good car (it doesn't even look like it was designed for high downforce. Instead, it produces more than anyone else... And has a the highest efficiency too. And it's even perfectly balanced). It only needs some more cooling.
CAEdevice has a very good car too, but lacks some front downforce. Increasing front downforce without decreasing cooling performance could be quite challenging.
A pity for SHM Racing, whose car seemed to be a very, very good start. Weird numbers...
Hi Variante,
I am not sure from where you have the numbers on the right hand side of your table.
What I liked about the results this race was that it was not like in the last KVRC races where the power was "digital" either 100% or 40%. This time the cooling duct design gave results inside the possible range. To understand why Matteo's car was so good I made a plot:
It shows the downforce the cars generated vs. their cooling performance. The dashed line shows a pareto frontier of some of the best cars indicating the trade-off between downforce and cooling performance. The cars are JJR, Variante and HP-Racing.
CAEdevice is far above that frontier showing how he simply managed to build a much better car. Also you can see that HP-Racing has way more cooling performance than everyone else except CAEdevice. Yet without JJR's penalty he would have been on position 4. This shows that cooling is not favored over downforce. Also keep in mind that JJR might have got all this downforce with an illegal floor, which should better not happen again.
etsmc wrote:would anyone be willing to do a write-up or short video on how to open the case.foam file in ParaView and get something useful out of it. I know I have asked before and I have tried opening the case file as a decomposed case but all I seem to be able to get is the box that is the wind tunnel and some strangely shaped thing inside it at the very front that is off to one side. I know my case is running and I am getting meaningful results from it.
Still need to get some more front downforce and looks like i may be getting on top of my cooling.
Can somebody help him? I am very busy today.