Just_a_fan wrote:iotar__ wrote:
- Rules are rules =D> . High speed fouls are not dangerous, 0,02 speeding behind SC is.
Actually, the safety car foul is the bigger issue because of the potential danger to marshals on the track. Under the safety car they expect the drivers to respect that they are in potentially dangerous places and behave accordingly. Drivers going at it with each other is what they're paid to do - they're also surrounded with just about the safest safety cells made by man. The marshals are surrounded only by an orange cotton overall. That's the difference.
- we're not talking about general "SC issue" but comparing penalties
- No, it's not much more serious to be tenth or whatever it was over limits under SC (physical act that has no safety implications) than to cause a high speed collision. But fine that's not the problem, it's a tool to force behaviour applied automatically, I'm not arguing with that. Whether it's overreacting after previous negligence of drivers racing under yellows is not the issue.
- The real issue is how can you apply smallest possible penalty for 100% one-sided high speed collision, example of a bad driving in comparison with similar or bigger penalties for lesser transgressions (like Hulkenberg's in Malaysia or Merhi's here). The other side of the equation is questioned.
I watched a replay and Sky "experts" for 5 minutes were looking for Maldonado's fault in the most blatant one-sided foul situation, this is just an alternative world.