get this back on good ground:
the moment it was really over for Lewis
You know, I'm just going to ignore the sarcasm and enjoy you admitting defeat .TAG wrote:Thought we'd already established is was his bad start in Japan. Lewis should have been absolutely perfect in order to overcome those pesky mechanical issues, that's why Rosberg is so deserving of his title because he was absolutely perfect at keeping his PU from blowing up unlike Hamilton.
Rinse, lather, repeat.
Invalid.. 2015 = 19 rounds. 2016 = 21 rounds. So you actually are helping Hamilton's case.Diesel wrote:2016 WDCdans79 wrote:My take is that Nico is undeserving, as he won by luck not by merit.
ROS - 385
HAM - 380
2015 WDC
HAM - 380
ROS - 322
2016 WDCringo wrote:Invalid.. 2015 = 19 rounds. 2016 = 21 rounds. So you actually are helping Hamilton's case.Diesel wrote:2016 WDCdans79 wrote:My take is that Nico is undeserving, as he won by luck not by merit.
ROS - 385
HAM - 380
2015 WDC
HAM - 380
ROS - 322
adjusted:
2016 WDC
ROS - 385 , total points in season = 525, Nico took 73% of them.
HAM - 380 hamilton took 67%
2015 WDCHAM - 380 total 475 = 80% of total possible
ROS - 322= 67%
Hamilton unreliable 2016 season was more dominant than Nico's best ever.
Hamilton 2015, even while easing up with 3 races to go, was effortlessly better than Nico's team assisted 2016.
Manoah2u wrote:http://c8.alamy.com/comp/FW2DN4/british ... FW2DN4.jpg
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2016/09/ ... 422261.jpg
http://i2.mirror.co.uk/incoming/article ... ddy%20Lowe
http://www.racinginfocus.com/rif/wp-con ... 20x330.jpg
http://static4.businessinsider.com/imag ... lowski.jpg
http://image.shutterstock.com/display_p ... 492337.jpg
https://www.formula1.com/content/fom-we ... medium.jpg
https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/2ad9ff91 ... 72e4861179
http://media.gettyimages.com/photos/mer ... ?s=594x594
http://cache2.asset-cache.net/gc/459443 ... Sn0w%3D%3D
http://www.motorsport-total.com/bilder/ ... 731609.jpg
Maybe he went out to the clubs Hamilton style? to forget he lost the WDC? Dunno, I also found it strange.Vasconia wrote: Umm the level of serious argumentation is reaching some level of excelence as I can see.
By the way, what happened yesterday with Hamiton is more than weird, feeling umwell after 1 hour?
Yes and you mentioned it in that thread.Vasconia wrote:Manoah2u wrote:http://c8.alamy.com/comp/FW2DN4/british ... FW2DN4.jpg
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2016/09/ ... 422261.jpg
http://i2.mirror.co.uk/incoming/article ... ddy%20Lowe
http://www.racinginfocus.com/rif/wp-con ... 20x330.jpg
http://static4.businessinsider.com/imag ... lowski.jpg
http://image.shutterstock.com/display_p ... 492337.jpg
https://www.formula1.com/content/fom-we ... medium.jpg
https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/2ad9ff91 ... 72e4861179
http://media.gettyimages.com/photos/mer ... ?s=594x594
http://cache2.asset-cache.net/gc/459443 ... Sn0w%3D%3D
http://www.motorsport-total.com/bilder/ ... 731609.jpg
Umm the level of serious argumentation is reaching some level of excelence as I can see.
By the way, what happened yesterday with Hamiton is more than weird, feeling umwell after 1 hour?
Full disclosure, I wanted Hamilton to win, but I'm not crazy enough to say Nico was underserving etc. He won, let's get over it and look to 2017.ringo wrote:
Invalid.. 2015 = 19 rounds. 2016 = 21 rounds. So you actually are helping Hamilton's case.
adjusted:
2016 WDC
ROS - 385 , total points in season = 525, Nico took 73% of them.
HAM - 380 hamilton took 67%
2015 WDC
HAM - 380 total 475 = 80% of total possible
ROS - 322= 67%
Hamilton unreliable 2016 season was more dominant than Nico's best ever.
Hamilton 2015, even while easing up with 3 races to go, was effortlessly better than Nico's team assisted 2016.