here is the real quote from autosportsFerraripilot wrote:siskue2005 wrote:oh common they didnt say that about the front tyres!!bosanac1 wrote:once again in AMUS
they are saying that Schumacher doesn't like the front tires
either its BS by German media or PZero have weak fronts or W02 is lacking again.
schumacher was talking about the tyre degradation
its a mis quote, as now people will interpret it as last year's tyre problem...when in reality he was just saying the tyre degradation is bad and hope it will be changed....exactly like all the other dirvers were saying!
thank you very much as I about to post this. Schumacher is saying the exact same thing many many others driver are stating, which is that the Pirelli's have a degradation issue. Hammy put it best, "the fronts fall off quick"
no wrongBorisTheBlade wrote:@JET
Well, if you say so. IMHO it was until the second or third test that they admitted to have a bit of a problem to 'adjust' the car correctly. It was said to be no big deal. And i do remember especially you stating how tight their rear was and what an Über-Diffuser and Front wing they might introduce. But such is my memory
You remember well Boris, Yes I did expect Mercedes to add front wings and diffusers... but my understanding of F1 has grown since last year.BorisTheBlade wrote:@JET
Well, if you say so. IMHO it was until the second or third test that they admitted to have a bit of a problem to 'adjust' the car correctly. It was said to be no big deal. And i do remember especially you stating how tight their rear was and what an Über-Diffuser and Front wing they might introduce. But such is my memory
Yes, most teams would have to guess which weight distribution would have been optimal for the new Pirelli's.forty-two wrote:But surely the weight distribution issue would be lesser than before now we have standardised WD?
These people that base a cars performance on the way it looks I find rather funny. Unless you know aerodynamically how it will perform just from looking at it then what is the point? Ferrari's 2010 car looked clean and simple - nothing extravagant, but it was a generally fast car. Essentially all this talk on these cars are assumptions until we really see them widen there strides and get rippa dippin. Remember too how Sauber topped the pre season tests last year?jav wrote:1st post - be gentle.
I must say that to this point, I find Mercedes effort disappointing. With the early start on the car, I expected a McLaren/Renault style effort. A car with rather bold attempts at innovation- not what appears to be mostly immitation. Not that either car will prove faster than W02 in final form. But, at this point, it certainly seems we brought a knife to a gun fight.
Mclaren's car looks to represent an aggresive design approach, and the teams posture is one of "Despite what you CAN see- there's much more you can't see". Contrast that to how Merc's handling this launch. Conservative, uninspiring, certainly not setting the bar very high given that they gave up very early in '10 to focus on this??
Maybe they're playing it close to the vest but everything from the car to the rederick at this point suggests finishing 4th in the constructors championship may be optomistic considering what the competition have been able to show with seemingly less development time.
Shafto wrote:
These people that base a cars performance on the way it looks I find rather funny. Unless you know aerodynamically how it will perform just from looking at it then what is the point? Ferrari's 2010 car looked clean and simple - nothing extravagant, but it was a generally fast car. Essentially all this talk on these cars are assumptions until we really see them widen there strides and get rippa dippin. Remember too how Sauber topped the pre season tests last year?
Now I am not saying that the W02 will be a fast car but just saying that we will just have to wait until first quali to really get an idea. CANT WAIT!!
Red bull didn't even attend the first test last year...Ferraripilot wrote:The Red Bull didn't show good pace this time last year either. Just saying.
...and by the end of the '09 season, RedBull had developed their cars performance beyond that of the Championship car. If Merc. showed that type of progression last year, I'd be less worried.Caerdroia wrote:Red bull didn't even attend the first test last year...Ferraripilot wrote:The Red Bull didn't show good pace this time last year either. Just saying.
Caerdroia wrote:Red bull didn't even attend the first test last year...Ferraripilot wrote:The Red Bull didn't show good pace this time last year either. Just saying.
Except many of the industry insiders were saying that Red Bull were showing great pace in the long runs, and predicted that they'd be the car to beat. Just because they didn't go for a headline time it doesn't mean that the pace of the car, or not, is not apparent.Ferraripilot wrote:And when they did they sure didn't show their hand at Barcelona.