WhiteBlue wrote:myurr wrote:Then why are Red Bull's management still briefing against one of their drivers even after the 'clear the air' talks
Peddling your opinion again? What is new about it?
Errr... ditto. And do the following comments from Marko come across as being for the good of the team, constructive, etc. Do you think they are aimed at keeping the peace? You still haven't criticised him for making those comments.
Dr Marko wrote:Mark is having a great season, and has also improved big time, but he should not forget that he owes much of this to the team. Where was he two years ago?
Then he could not even dream of grand prix victories. Today, we have given him a car that he can win on his own.
Those comments are all about putting the driver in his place - at Marko's bidding.
WhiteBlue wrote:Red Bull are giving both drivers equal preference for a WDC and the man who ownes the team has pledged that to the world. Naturally some poor souls will always only listen to sources which confirm their own preconceptions. Nothing wrong with it. It's the way of the world. Smart people will see through it.
And some poor souls keep believing everything the RB management keep spewing out, even though they've been shown to lie time after time with constantly shifting stories. Again it leaks out that Marko called the shots in the RB wing row when Horner claimed that the decision was 100% his. As in Turkey the stories and information leaking from the team are shifting over time, making it difficult to believe anything the team says.
WhiteBlue wrote:Red Bull are not briefing against one of their drivers.
So Marko didn't say those words above that were attributed to him?
WhiteBlue wrote:One of their drivers is a bit paranoid or thought that manipulating the public into thinking there was favoritism would give him the edge. It turned out he was briefly successful because the world is full of fools. It will not happen another time IMO. So it is high time that we return to business as usual regarding Red Bull. Let them do their job and if you feel you need to judge them listen at least to both sides of the debate.
Or one of their drivers was being disadvantaged to the benefit of the driver you support, and decided to go public in an effort to get a level playing field. Note that Webber has NEVER asked for advantage only a level playing field with his team mate.
Also note that Vettel still hasn't publicly said he expects Webber to be given a level playing field and that even if offered by the team he wouldn't accept unfair advantage. That was the recommendation of one of the articles that
you linked to for how Vettel could prove he wasn't complicit and restore his reputation.