Italian GP 2010 - Monza

For ease of use, there is one thread per grand prix where you can discuss everything during that specific GP weekend. You can find these threads here.
andrew
andrew
0
Joined: 16 Feb 2010, 15:08
Location: Aberdeen, Scotland - WhiteBlue Country (not the region)

Re: Italian GP 2010 - Monza

Post

No. He went for a non-existant gap and found a red car in the way.

Giblet
Giblet
5
Joined: 19 Mar 2007, 01:47
Location: Canada

Re: Italian GP 2010 - Monza

Post

The RedBulls have their trick brakes at the bottom of the wheels. Normally,, with the brake being in the vertical or near vertical position, a jolt would put force on the brake in the way they operate, no big deal. By hitting a curb and jolting the brake up, it could cause problems as they are not designed to take much load that way I would think.
Before I do anything I ask myself “Would an idiot do that?” And if the answer is yes, I do not do that thing. - Dwight Schrute

Sean H
Sean H
0
Joined: 11 Apr 2009, 06:05
Location: KC

Re: Italian GP 2010 - Monza

Post

Guessdot wrote:Anyone here thinks it is partly due to the kerbs being so high? as we can see from the video.. Hamilton didn't really had any place to go and if the kerbs is not that high, maybe he can cut the corner.. just maybe..
All cars are equipped with brake pedals and steering wheels. Running into the back of another racer is the drivers fault. No different than when Vettel lost control and speared Button last race. LH even admitted he was totally to blame. The curbs are built that way to keep the cars on track. You race on the track.

One thing we have learned with the Williams and Macca colliding with the rear of the Ferrari, the Ferrari has a very solid rear suspension.

As far as the Macca being faster, I believe that Alonso had Button measured up and was just waiting to see what happened with pitting and strategy first. It would have been a forceful pass, but we all have seen Alonso do it before.

As far as the G4 or whatever being a fuel saver, for all we know they were giving him more to try and stay in touch with Alonso (which he couldn't do) and stay in front of Massa, which I believe took all the speed Button had to do so.

The second half of the race was owned by the Ferraris, if it wasn't for Button's great start, this was a 1-2 walkaway.

the red bulls looked toothless on a fast track.
"The car is slow in the straights and doesn't work well in the corners." JV

User avatar
ringo
230
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 10:57

Re: Italian GP 2010 - Monza

Post

andrew wrote:No. He went for a non-existant gap and found a red car in the way.
Not exactly true. He was in Alonso's shadow, and Massa could have braked as well,or simply stick to the outside curb. No car was in his way really.
Going for a non existent gap only happens when the other car is clearly ahead or is guarding the inside.
Massa hit him in the back too before the front wheel, so it was more like Massa ramming his way through. Massa could easily have ridden the curb, but he wanted to eliminate the man that took the 2008 championship from him, he enjoyed it.
For Sure!!

User avatar
raymondu999
54
Joined: 04 Feb 2010, 07:31

Re: Italian GP 2010 - Monza

Post

andrew wrote:A brake was slightly jammed on and slowing the car. Kind of like driving a road car with the hand brake slightly on. I've done it (ahem!) by mistake in an automatic that I wasn't familier with and you would be surprised at how much of a difference it can make.
Right. I've never done it. Really. I swear. Ok fine I did it once too :P
失败者找理由,成功者找方法

andrew
andrew
0
Joined: 16 Feb 2010, 15:08
Location: Aberdeen, Scotland - WhiteBlue Country (not the region)

Re: Italian GP 2010 - Monza

Post

In my defense the handbrake light was not on. #-o

Giblet
Giblet
5
Joined: 19 Mar 2007, 01:47
Location: Canada

Re: Italian GP 2010 - Monza

Post

ringo wrote:
andrew wrote:No. He went for a non-existant gap and found a red car in the way.
Not exactly true. He was in Alonso's shadow, and Massa could have braked as well,or simply stick to the outside curb. No car was in his way really.
Going for a non existent gap only happens when the other car is clearly ahead or is guarding the inside.
Massa hit him in the back too before the front wheel, so it was more like Massa ramming his way through. Massa could easily have ridden the curb, but he wanted to eliminate the man that took the 2008 championship from him, he enjoyed it.

Massa said in the post-race he had no idea Lewis was there until he felt the bump, so he did nothing but race and get hit by an over exuberant Hamilton who admitted it was entirely his fault.

I would say that makes it entirely his fault, since both drivers agree.
Before I do anything I ask myself “Would an idiot do that?” And if the answer is yes, I do not do that thing. - Dwight Schrute

User avatar
WhiteBlue
92
Joined: 14 Apr 2008, 20:58
Location: WhiteBlue Country

Re: Italian GP 2010 - Monza

Post

andrew wrote:
raymondu999 wrote:What's brake binding by the way?
A brake was slightly jammed on and slowing the car. Kind of like driving a road car with the hand brake slightly on. I've done it (ahem!) by mistake in an automatic that I wasn't familier with and you would be surprised at how much of a difference it can make.
That may have been the reason for the lack of speed in qualifying but I do not believe that it caused Seb to say that the engine was dying on him. Horner speculated that a visor tear off could have got into the air box and blocked the air or fuel intake to some cylinders.
Formula One's fundamental ethos is about success coming to those with the most ingenious engineering and best .............................. organization, not to those with the biggest budget. (Dave Richards)

andrew
andrew
0
Joined: 16 Feb 2010, 15:08
Location: Aberdeen, Scotland - WhiteBlue Country (not the region)

Re: Italian GP 2010 - Monza

Post

WhiteBlue wrote:
andrew wrote:
raymondu999 wrote:What's brake binding by the way?
A brake was slightly jammed on and slowing the car. Kind of like driving a road car with the hand brake slightly on. I've done it (ahem!) by mistake in an automatic that I wasn't familier with and you would be surprised at how much of a difference it can make.
That may have been the reason for the lack of speed in qualifying but I do not believe that it caused Seb to say that the engine was dying on him. Horner speculated that a visor tear off could have got into the air box and blocked the air or fuel intake to some cylinders.
Then he immediately rubbished it. Where would the tear off have gone? It would still be flapping about in there causing problems. Horner stated that until they carry out futher investigations he feels it was a brake binding that was slowing the car, giving the driver a feeling of the engine dying as his speed would have been reduced.

User avatar
ringo
230
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 10:57

Re: Italian GP 2010 - Monza

Post

I don't think the ferraris had a big advantage today. Alonso almost looked helpless trying to follow Button. Anyone saw how planted the Mclaren was exiting the chicanes?
I really thought button had it in the bag. But i knew Alonso could make the pace in clean air when needed.
I enjoyed the time battle, this is what i like in F1, refueling would have given us more of what we saw today, a straight fight to the end.
I remember when Button was the fastest on track, Mclaren told him we're in the window. After hearing that Alonso started putting in the speed. Massa was even the fastest guy on the track at some points.
Button then was told to find the pace. Did he find it? No, so Alonso and even Massa could have easily got past.
If it was Hamilton, all that would have needed to be said was "we need 9 qualifying laps Lewis" and the win would be in the bag.

Button drove valiantly and smartly and sometimes looking invincible, but he just doesn't have the pace. His pace was so average, i'm of the opinion Hamilton could have passed him in the stops.
From i saw Alonso holding onto that 0.66s gap i knew He had button under control.
For Sure!!

User avatar
raymondu999
54
Joined: 04 Feb 2010, 07:31

Re: Italian GP 2010 - Monza

Post

WhiteBlue wrote:
andrew wrote:
raymondu999 wrote:What's brake binding by the way?
A brake was slightly jammed on and slowing the car. Kind of like driving a road car with the hand brake slightly on. I've done it (ahem!) by mistake in an automatic that I wasn't familier with and you would be surprised at how much of a difference it can make.
That may have been the reason for the lack of speed in qualifying but I do not believe that it caused Seb to say that the engine was dying on him. Horner speculated that a visor tear off could have got into the air box and blocked the air or fuel intake to some cylinders.
Brake binding? Wow. I thought there was something wrong on Seb's engine in qually as well, but that doesn't matter now. But Seb really did slow down a lot on the lap where Webbo passed him for P7. I don't think he would've been able to take on the front 3 anyways. And this is the 2nd time we've seen a Rosberg train, no? I guess Trulli gave him some lessons.
andrew wrote:In my defense the handbrake light was not on. #-o
Mine was. And my hand was on the handbrake too. Pure brainfade on my part. I was wondering what was wrong with the car :P
失败者找理由,成功者找方法

User avatar
ringo
230
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 10:57

Re: Italian GP 2010 - Monza

Post

Giblet wrote:
ringo wrote:
andrew wrote:No. He went for a non-existant gap and found a red car in the way.
Not exactly true. He was in Alonso's shadow, and Massa could have braked as well,or simply stick to the outside curb. No car was in his way really.
Going for a non existent gap only happens when the other car is clearly ahead or is guarding the inside.
Massa hit him in the back too before the front wheel, so it was more like Massa ramming his way through. Massa could easily have ridden the curb, but he wanted to eliminate the man that took the 2008 championship from him, he enjoyed it.

Massa said in the post-race he had no idea Lewis was there until he felt the bump, so he did nothing but race and get hit by an over exuberant Hamilton who admitted it was entirely his fault.

I would say that makes it entirely his fault, since both drivers agree.
It's funny how Massa didn't see anything. I think he knew exactly what he was doing. He spent so much time explain his actions as well, which is a sign of guilt.
It's Hamilton's fault for believing Massa would fear him and give room. It's Massa's fault for ramming his depleted uranium battle tank into Hamilton, knowing full well it wont even scratch the paint.
I'd say it's a racing incident, but nowhere near Vettel's recent stupidity.
For Sure!!

User avatar
raymondu999
54
Joined: 04 Feb 2010, 07:31

Re: Italian GP 2010 - Monza

Post

ringo wrote:If it was Hamilton, all that would have needed to be said was "we need 9 qualifying laps Lewis" and the win would be in the bag.
Errm... that's not what happened last year. He binned it out of Lesmo 1 doing "8 qualifying laps"
失败者找理由,成功者找方法

User avatar
WhiteBlue
92
Joined: 14 Apr 2008, 20:58
Location: WhiteBlue Country

Re: Italian GP 2010 - Monza

Post

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U9I7FE2XP3I[/youtube]
HRT right rear wheel mechanic run over during Yamamoto's pit stop.
Last edited by WhiteBlue on 12 Sep 2010, 18:29, edited 1 time in total.
Formula One's fundamental ethos is about success coming to those with the most ingenious engineering and best .............................. organization, not to those with the biggest budget. (Dave Richards)

timbo
timbo
111
Joined: 22 Oct 2007, 10:14

Re: Italian GP 2010 - Monza

Post

ringo wrote:It's Massa's fault for ramming his depleted uranium battle tank into Hamilton, knowing full well it wont even scratch the paint.
I'd repeat once again, there's no room for two cars in Roggia.
Had Hamilton somehow miraculously made it thru first apex, he'd be in gravel in second.