All cars are equipped with brake pedals and steering wheels. Running into the back of another racer is the drivers fault. No different than when Vettel lost control and speared Button last race. LH even admitted he was totally to blame. The curbs are built that way to keep the cars on track. You race on the track.Guessdot wrote:Anyone here thinks it is partly due to the kerbs being so high? as we can see from the video.. Hamilton didn't really had any place to go and if the kerbs is not that high, maybe he can cut the corner.. just maybe..
Not exactly true. He was in Alonso's shadow, and Massa could have braked as well,or simply stick to the outside curb. No car was in his way really.andrew wrote:No. He went for a non-existant gap and found a red car in the way.
Right. I've never done it. Really. I swear. Ok fine I did it once tooandrew wrote:A brake was slightly jammed on and slowing the car. Kind of like driving a road car with the hand brake slightly on. I've done it (ahem!) by mistake in an automatic that I wasn't familier with and you would be surprised at how much of a difference it can make.
ringo wrote:Not exactly true. He was in Alonso's shadow, and Massa could have braked as well,or simply stick to the outside curb. No car was in his way really.andrew wrote:No. He went for a non-existant gap and found a red car in the way.
Going for a non existent gap only happens when the other car is clearly ahead or is guarding the inside.
Massa hit him in the back too before the front wheel, so it was more like Massa ramming his way through. Massa could easily have ridden the curb, but he wanted to eliminate the man that took the 2008 championship from him, he enjoyed it.
That may have been the reason for the lack of speed in qualifying but I do not believe that it caused Seb to say that the engine was dying on him. Horner speculated that a visor tear off could have got into the air box and blocked the air or fuel intake to some cylinders.andrew wrote:A brake was slightly jammed on and slowing the car. Kind of like driving a road car with the hand brake slightly on. I've done it (ahem!) by mistake in an automatic that I wasn't familier with and you would be surprised at how much of a difference it can make.raymondu999 wrote:What's brake binding by the way?
Then he immediately rubbished it. Where would the tear off have gone? It would still be flapping about in there causing problems. Horner stated that until they carry out futher investigations he feels it was a brake binding that was slowing the car, giving the driver a feeling of the engine dying as his speed would have been reduced.WhiteBlue wrote:That may have been the reason for the lack of speed in qualifying but I do not believe that it caused Seb to say that the engine was dying on him. Horner speculated that a visor tear off could have got into the air box and blocked the air or fuel intake to some cylinders.andrew wrote:A brake was slightly jammed on and slowing the car. Kind of like driving a road car with the hand brake slightly on. I've done it (ahem!) by mistake in an automatic that I wasn't familier with and you would be surprised at how much of a difference it can make.raymondu999 wrote:What's brake binding by the way?
Brake binding? Wow. I thought there was something wrong on Seb's engine in qually as well, but that doesn't matter now. But Seb really did slow down a lot on the lap where Webbo passed him for P7. I don't think he would've been able to take on the front 3 anyways. And this is the 2nd time we've seen a Rosberg train, no? I guess Trulli gave him some lessons.WhiteBlue wrote:That may have been the reason for the lack of speed in qualifying but I do not believe that it caused Seb to say that the engine was dying on him. Horner speculated that a visor tear off could have got into the air box and blocked the air or fuel intake to some cylinders.andrew wrote:A brake was slightly jammed on and slowing the car. Kind of like driving a road car with the hand brake slightly on. I've done it (ahem!) by mistake in an automatic that I wasn't familier with and you would be surprised at how much of a difference it can make.raymondu999 wrote:What's brake binding by the way?
Mine was. And my hand was on the handbrake too. Pure brainfade on my part. I was wondering what was wrong with the carandrew wrote:In my defense the handbrake light was not on.
It's funny how Massa didn't see anything. I think he knew exactly what he was doing. He spent so much time explain his actions as well, which is a sign of guilt.Giblet wrote:ringo wrote:Not exactly true. He was in Alonso's shadow, and Massa could have braked as well,or simply stick to the outside curb. No car was in his way really.andrew wrote:No. He went for a non-existant gap and found a red car in the way.
Going for a non existent gap only happens when the other car is clearly ahead or is guarding the inside.
Massa hit him in the back too before the front wheel, so it was more like Massa ramming his way through. Massa could easily have ridden the curb, but he wanted to eliminate the man that took the 2008 championship from him, he enjoyed it.
Massa said in the post-race he had no idea Lewis was there until he felt the bump, so he did nothing but race and get hit by an over exuberant Hamilton who admitted it was entirely his fault.
I would say that makes it entirely his fault, since both drivers agree.
Errm... that's not what happened last year. He binned it out of Lesmo 1 doing "8 qualifying laps"ringo wrote:If it was Hamilton, all that would have needed to be said was "we need 9 qualifying laps Lewis" and the win would be in the bag.
I'd repeat once again, there's no room for two cars in Roggia.ringo wrote:It's Massa's fault for ramming his depleted uranium battle tank into Hamilton, knowing full well it wont even scratch the paint.