1 year deal would be outright silly and insulting so I don't see any compromise. I also doubt the assumption that it was Rosberg seeking long term deal and not Mercedes.Sounds like a compromise, between going with a 1 year (Merceds?) and a 3 year (Rosberg) deal. This would mean that both Nico and Lewis contract expire at the same time now... (by end of 2018)?
Well??? It was below basic competence in every aspect, mistakes, Q, pace, craft. Not inferior? He was losing to slower cars all the time. Add to the list posted earlier penalty and lost podium in Baku. "When the car is there" which means practically never if you pick and choose. He was failing with car being "there" all the time too: Bahrain, China, Russia, Baku, Spain."Kimi is giving his contribution to the constructors' championship, and in the first part of the 2016 season he has done well. When the car is there for him, I do not think that he is inferior to anybody."
Based on?iotar__ wrote: I also doubt the assumption that it was Rosberg seeking long term deal and not Mercedes.
The team wanted 1 year, Nico 3, so 2 has been the logic solution hahaha. It was only a matter of time.dren wrote:It's obviously what both Mercedes and Nico wanted because they signed a deal. That's sort of what deals are... Nico was most certainly shopping around to get a better deal from Mercedes.
I don't want to speak for someone else, but me? I doubt it too.GPR-A wrote:Based on?iotar__ wrote: I also doubt the assumption that it was Rosberg seeking long term deal and not Mercedes.
Well, he has adapted very well to the radio ban so he can be optimistic for the future.Nickel wrote:
It also won't do Nico any harm to feel out how his team adapt to 2017 regs.
I have no official information but rumours said that Nico wanted a 3 years deal.PlatinumZealot wrote:Dr. Z is a big Nico fan so I doubt that it was Mercedes that wanted a 1 year deal for Rosberg. I believe it was always 2 years and the talks were mostly about the minutiae.
If Dr. Z is a Nico fan, why would he say this?Bild newspaper claims the uncertainty about a new deal for Rosberg is indeed less about money and more to do with whether Mercedes wants to promote its young charger Pascal Wehrlein from Manor.
The team might therefore be happy with a mere one-year deal for Rosberg next year, but Berger and the 30-year-old is pushing for a full three-year extension.
Berger said: βWe need to agree with the strategy that they (Mercedes) want to go with for the future. If they agree, then we can negotiate.β