in what way shape or form was jenson faster in the race? i had the live timing up and at no stage was he faster. lewis came out just ahead of him after the pit stop and proceded to open up a 10 second gap, yeah jenson was onl slightly older tyres, but that much so, and like you said above...the hards were very durable.Diesel wrote:This thread needs closing, it's reduced to people just quoting things like 'luck'.
If you were paying attention to the race the swap to the prime tyre was an obvious thing to do and the best time to do it was while Hulkenberg held everybody up, Jenson capitalised on this. Jenson has shown his experience wins when it comes to strategy and a feel for what the track is doing.
Jenson struggles in qualifying and that appears to be mostly down to being able to make use tyres effecitvely, he seems to struggle to feel the limit quickly enough. The general observation in the paddock is that Jenson used to qualify very well on Michelin rubber which was described as a stickier type of rubber which was easier to get working. Bridgestones appear to be harder to get working and are alot more durable, take a look at McLaren today, 20 lap old tyres on the Ferrari & Red Bulls doing the same lap times as fresh tyres on the McLarens. This makes it hard for Jenson as his driving style tends to be a bit kindier to tyres. I am convinced that the Bridgestone compound that was used at Brazil could have easily done the entire race and still delivered comparable lap times throughout.
Next year should be interesting, the Pirelli tyre is an unkown which could play towards Jenson's strengths, or equally might not.
I also feel Jenson was faster than Lewis in the race, and could have overtaken him and finished ahead either in the pit stops or on track. He didn't ofcourse because from a championship point of view Jenson was out either way so it was a no-brainer to have Lewis finish ahead.
so stop talking rubbish.