fellowhoodlums wrote:Yup, Alonso's 1.44.7 on Tuesday with softs, before the new mapping and aero parts tells me they are at the front of the middle pack. . . . . . hopefully
What about Sauber's, Force India's, TS', Williams' or even Renault's (..24.945) times on softs if that's the indication you're using?
Vasconia wrote:godlameroso wrote:Best case scenario they're still around a second off the pace. It's McLaren and they know how to develop a car so I'm still hopeful they can be podium contenders if they develop throughout the year. Particularly since teams will want to shift to 2017 early enough since it's going to be a big change.
One second from Mercedes its a great scenario so yes, with the traditional great in-season development of the team they should fight for some podiums in the second half of the season(Hungary anyone?) if the gap is the one you have mentioned.
It's a made up scenario based on nothing, why 1 s and not 1,2 or 0,8, where did this one second come from? No indication. I don't understand either why McL would not be switching to '17 unlike podium contenders: Ferrari, Red Bull or even Williams. If it's the odd podium they're chasing they should be switching the first. If it's about resources first two teams are comparable. If it's about '16 results Ferrari might (theoretically) be pushing more if they can challenge Merc.