LMAOtimbo wrote:This looks funny)))zgred wrote:
Like this --
LMAOtimbo wrote:This looks funny)))zgred wrote:
Like this --
Wow, 76 laps with no-power steering, whilst matching the Virgin for pace. Mike might be right, perhaps they are top of the F1-B tree?Mike Gascoyne on autosport wrote: We didn't have power steering on so when it dried out the steering loads were just too heavy to really drive effectively.
Q. Fairuz [Fauzy] says he can't feel his arms now.
MG: Yes, it's slightly perverse that on your first day of proper testing you're hoping for it to stay wet. It's the first time I've ever heard over the radio a driver say 'thank God it's raining'. The power steering is on its way out, it was meant to be here yesterday but due to some supplier issues we didn't have it fitted.
So, possibly a less yesteryear engine cover tomorrow then?Mike Gascoyne on autosport wrote:There's a lot of development. We've got new aero bits on for tomorrow.
No quite sure how you can say that, Virgin have had teething problems but Lotus arn't necessarily faster than them.Pandamasque wrote:Lotus seem by far the most successful new team so far.
And most of you Guys bashed the team before anything was shown...nice car, Im sure it isnt the final version (aero wise...)Pandamasque wrote:Lotus seem by far the most successful new team so far.
zoic wrote:Lotus seem to be having some HEAT issues
http://www.f1today.nl/foto/7826/
Not just glowing exhaust, skip a few photos and you can see flames out the back.
I don't remember anyone bashing the team because of the car. We've heard of at least 2 Lotuses, 1 Brabham and 1 March during the 2009. And I still don't like the idea of new teams trying to take legendary names to get some instant following and sponsorship.LotusF1 wrote:And most of you Guys bashed the team before anything was shown...nice car, Im sure it isnt the final version (aero wise...)Pandamasque wrote:Lotus seem by far the most successful new team so far.