Restomaniac wrote: ↑21 Sep 2017, 10:07
GPR-A wrote: ↑21 Sep 2017, 09:56
Restomaniac wrote: ↑21 Sep 2017, 09:26
I made this point just after the last race. If Vettel goes much further behind then Hamilton being able to bring in an extra ICE into play and just taking a penalty starts to be a possibility to negate the new Ferrari ICE.
That is ASSUMING Ferrari PU is superior to Mercedes PU with conforming to reduced oil burning regulations. If that were to be the case, then we would have surely seen the new Ferrari PU making its debut in Monza. Nevertheless, I am eager to see what the new PU holds.
True. But like I say Hamilton may well have that option added to the fact that he has 2 engines that have only ran 2 races apiece so far. I wonder if it's because Ferrari have used up their turbo allocation. I always thought a ICE and Turbo were designed as a pair.
Ferrari introduced all their four TC pretty soon in the season indeed and that might come and bite them. I think it's safe to say they did this because there was a problem with the first (few) TC's. What we don't know is how strong the later ones are. I can imagine with less sharp tolerances and maybe a bit heavier, bit less on the edge, a TC should perform well all season. With the new no-token rules, they could take some risk in the early versions of a part and if that fails fall back on a bullet proof design for number four. To be very crazy, you now can design 4 very different PU's. One for all the low speed tracks or where you expect rain, lasting half the season and three that will only last a few races for high speed, or just one pure for Monza.... Last year, when your first design had a faulty seal or somewhere a bearing was slightly off or too light, you had a big big problem all season.