Death of the DDD's

Post here all non technical related topics about Formula One. This includes race results, discussions, testing analysis etc. TV coverage and other personal questions should be in Off topic chat.
User avatar
ISLAMATRON
0
Joined: 01 Oct 2008, 18:29

Re: Death of the DDD's

Post

Again another worthless post thats adds nothing to the discussion... your continued failed attempts at humor are depressing...

They are actually even worse than mine

Flabbio Fixatore
Flabbio Fixatore
0
Joined: 02 Jan 2010, 01:54

Re: Death of the DDD's

Post

The bigotry on this forum outweighs its technical contribution to the world at a 2:1 ratio.

It is sad that some teams close their eyes to what is best for the sport, while it is even more sad that some members refuse to accept that any view of what F1 should be that does not agree with their personal beliefs can have any merit.

I, for one, found F1 more enjoyable when 100% of my understanding came from televised events. It was when I looked deeper into the sport via the net that the nasty and disgusting underside and its inhabitants showed the real picture.

We shall see what happens in the next 10 years, because if things continue down this path, it will be ripe to see a new Formula take the viewership and respect that F1 currently abuses.

Flabbio Fixatore
Flabbio Fixatore
0
Joined: 02 Jan 2010, 01:54

Re: Death of the DDD's

Post

Anyone that thinks FOTA did the right thing in its strong arming of the FIA by threat of a break away should now see that it would have been better to let them break.

We would have seen some amazing cars in 2010 with sustainable budgets. In time, it would have either drawn the other teams back, or seen them die by their own hand.

And bigotry is bigotry. No matter who you think you are!

Richard
Richard
Moderator
Joined: 15 Apr 2009, 14:41
Location: UK

Re: Death of the DDD's

Post

ISLAMATRON wrote:The FIA tried to do that with the budget cap rules and FOTA overrode them with court battles and threats of a breakaway...
The FIA and FOTA were looking to pick a fight for many reasons. As with most fights, each side says the other started it.

Hopefully the change of personnel in the grid and the FIA will result in a more constructive and collaborative approach for the greater good of F1.

User avatar
ISLAMATRON
0
Joined: 01 Oct 2008, 18:29

Re: Death of the DDD's

Post

richard_leeds wrote:
ISLAMATRON wrote:The FIA tried to do that with the budget cap rules and FOTA overrode them with court battles and threats of a breakaway...
The FIA and FOTA were looking to pick a fight for many reasons. As with most fights, each side says the other started it.

Hopefully the change of personnel in the grid and the FIA will result in a more constructive and collaborative approach for the greater good of F1.
I hope so too, but with Luca still in the picture and Flav trying to get back in the "greater good" will always be in jeopardy.

User avatar
WhiteBlue
92
Joined: 14 Apr 2008, 20:58
Location: WhiteBlue Country

Re: Death of the DDD's

Post

Adrian Newey gave this year's Watkins Lecture

Red Bull designer and top F1 aerodynamicist Adrian Newey believes the proposed ban on double diffusers in 2011 won’t make it easier for F1 cars to overtake.

Speaking at the Watkins Lecture at Autosport International he said:

I don’t think [double diffusers] affected the overtaking. It gave us more downforce and made the cars about a second a lap quicker. That doesn’t change whether the car’s going to overtake or not, there’s no difference in the aerodynamic wake which is what affects the ability of the car behind to overtake.
Adrian Newey


He said F1 should not slip back into the practice of introducing piecemeal changes to the regulations as it had during the “narrow track” era of 1998-2008:

The regulations we had for 2009 were the subject of a lot of research by the Overtaking Working Group. It’s questionable whether they worked or not, but the process, I think, was correct.

What’s now happening is we’ve gone back to these piecemeal modifications – banning double diffusers or getting rid of barge boards. For me, it’s very frustrating that it’s not being thought out. [It needs] a clear goal and proper research.

So often in Formula 1, things are changed with very little research.
Adrian Newey

He echoed the view of Sam Michaels and Paddy Lowe that the role of circuit design needs to be looked at.

Newey has similar concerns about the ban on refuelling during races:

I think the ban on refuelling is another example of that where… maybe it will be good for the racing, but it was not thought out. Some people thought “we could save a £100,000 here by cutting the cost of flying the refuelling rigs around the world. But if that destroys the spectacle and the racing becomes more boring as a result of that and people start turning their televisions off, then that wasn’t £100,000 well saved.
Adrian Newey
Newey seems to confirm that banning diffusors will mainly serve up a new aero config and will not help overtaking. 2011 could also see the return of KERS if Ferrari get it their way.
Formula One's fundamental ethos is about success coming to those with the most ingenious engineering and best .............................. organization, not to those with the biggest budget. (Dave Richards)

BreezyRacer
BreezyRacer
2
Joined: 04 Nov 2006, 00:31

Re: Death of the DDD's

Post

Well I have to say that if there is anyone that should know it's Newey.

Raptor22
Raptor22
26
Joined: 07 Apr 2009, 22:48

Re: Death of the DDD's

Post

There are a few things that can be reintroduced to improve teh spectacle and the cars.

I loved Gordon Murray's fan car idea. it was ingenious and should serve as a platform for generating sufficient downforce whilst allowing following distances to remain close.

KERS needs more freedom. the rubbish 6.6secs per lap needs to disappear and use of it should be freed.

higher narrower wings are fine.
Diffusors are fine.
flat bottom cars but with a minimum ride height of 50mm to keep ground effect in check.

BreezyRacer
BreezyRacer
2
Joined: 04 Nov 2006, 00:31

Re: Death of the DDD's

Post

Raptor22 wrote:There are a few things that can be reintroduced to improve teh spectacle and the cars.

I loved Gordon Murray's fan car idea. it was ingenious and should serve as a platform for generating sufficient downforce whilst allowing following distances to remain close.

KERS needs more freedom. the rubbish 6.6secs per lap needs to disappear and use of it should be freed.

higher narrower wings are fine.
Diffusors are fine.
flat bottom cars but with a minimum ride height of 50mm to keep ground effect in check.
I totally agree about KERS. It's use should be unlimited, based only on the technology. However the flat bottom is a very bad idea. We need stepped bottoms for safety reasons. The front wings need to be narrower, allowing the cars to be closer in traffic without damage.

wesley123
wesley123
204
Joined: 23 Feb 2008, 17:55

Re: Death of the DDD's

Post

The Fan car wasnt good fro folowing, actually it is dangerous, it sucks air out with a much higher rate, what do you think that happens with all the sand and rocks etc.? it gets thrown out with much higher speeds than would happen with a regular diffuser.
"Bite my shiny metal ass" - Bender

marcush.
marcush.
159
Joined: 09 Mar 2004, 16:55

Re: Death of the DDD's

Post

with the possibilities of today why not impose physical limits to lateral and longidudinal gs instead of limting wingspan ride heights etc .
So you got a direct download of current performance during qualy and race and as soon as someone does remain more than the odd tenth of a second outside the allowed threshole he gets a warning and if the keeps doing so he ´s getting a drivethru ,then ....
this way around the teams would have a complete new challenge just how to keep tzhe car in this window passively....

xpensive
xpensive
214
Joined: 22 Nov 2008, 18:06
Location: Somewhere in Scandinavia

Re: Death of the DDD's

Post

wesley123 wrote:The Fan car wasnt good fro folowing, actually it is dangerous, it sucks air out with a much higher rate, what do you think that happens with all the sand and rocks etc.? it gets thrown out with much higher speeds than would happen with a regular diffuser.
I think the fan-car idea is great, what you have to do though is to apply a "dustbag", just like in a vacuum-cleaner.
"I spent most of my money on wine and women...I wasted the rest"

dumrick
dumrick
0
Joined: 19 Jan 2004, 13:36
Location: Portugal

Re: Death of the DDD's

Post

xpensive wrote:I think the fan-car idea is great, what you have to do though is to apply a "dustbag", just like in a vacuum-cleaner.
So, you'd have, in the end, the racing version of this:
Image

??? :lol:

xpensive
xpensive
214
Joined: 22 Nov 2008, 18:06
Location: Somewhere in Scandinavia

Re: Death of the DDD's

Post

There you go, very good for cleaning up the mess after front-wing clashes.
"I spent most of my money on wine and women...I wasted the rest"

alexbarwell
alexbarwell
0
Joined: 20 Mar 2008, 14:19
Location: London

Re: Death of the DDD's

Post

I dunno, looks like the CoG is a bit high and the aero needs some work. Probably not passed the FiA crash structure tests yet
:wink:
I am an engineer, not a conceptualist :)