None as far as "performance" goes, but in the scheme of improving the show, the 2010 Bridgestone in most cases is "too good" in that the team changes tire mostly depends on satisfying the rule, rather than needing to because the performance degrades. Crappier tire should mean more pitstop or having driving trying to drive and cope with a less than optimum car. That delta should produce more variations in the racing on track...Jersey Tom wrote:What's the advantage of tires that wear faster?
Blistering control springs to mind.Jersey Tom wrote:What's the advantage of tires that wear faster?
Someone a lot smarter than me will know the answer, as I certainly don't know....Jersey Tom wrote:
Or if we're going to make the pit strategy argument with tire depredation.. then why get rid of refueling?
Maybe there are simply different people that say this.Jersey Tom wrote:I just find it odd that we have some people clamoring "We need less marbles so there's more area to pass!" and at the same time "Tires should wear faster!"
Refueling should be back anyway. The arguments of fast wearing tires and refueling go hand in hand.Or if we're going to make the pit strategy argument with tire depredation.. then why get rid of refueling?
I disagree - refuelling never added to the on track excitement, often instead leaving drivers just waiting for their pit stops to overtake. The problems with the on track racing this season were not due to the lack of refuelling but due to the teams having tyres that could last the entire race on pretty much any car in the pit lane. We didn't have any split strategies as they could all just go full race distance on those tyres.mep wrote:Refueling should be back anyway. The arguments of fast wearing tires and refueling go hand in hand.Or if we're going to make the pit strategy argument with tire depredation.. then why get rid of refueling?
I thought Pirelli was going to produce only three compounds for next year - soft, medium and hard.raymondu999 wrote:They'll get 4 sets on both days, of softs and mediums... I wonder how they'll get feedback for the supersofts and the hards though
I think that opens option for strategic maneuvering though. At some point the guy who went all out will be able to over come the pitstop gap and just plainly go faster than the guy who is saving tires. Just look at this year (Suzuka, for instance), some driver ran long on the tires, went for fresh set near the end, and was able to race back to positions that they held before the stop....mep wrote:Well on the other side you should keep in mind that when tires wear much faster drivers will also care much more about them and therefore will not race very hard. Instead of more overtaking you will just see drivers waiting until their competitors tires are gone.
Errrm... where did you get this stuff? RBR is fielding Vettel again. Renault is fielding Kubica. Sauber fielding Koba in the morning, then Perez in the afternoon.mach11 wrote:Pirelli testing: Day 2 line-up
Red Bull-Renault -- Mark Webber
McLaren-Mercedes -- Oliver Turvey
Ferrari -- Fernando Alonso
Mercedes GP -- Michael Schumacher
Renault -- Vitaly Petrov
Williams-Cosworth -- Rubens Barrichello
Force India-Mercedes -- Vitantonio Liuzzi
Sauber-Ferrari -- Sergio Pérez
Toro Rosso-Ferrari --Sébastien Buemi
Lotus-Cosworth -- Jarno Trulli
Hispania-Cosworth -- Pastor Maldonado
Virgin-Cosworth -- Lucas di Grassi
I don't know if that was the case, but recent interviews state 4 compounds and specifically mention a super-soft.mith wrote:I thought Pirelli was going to produce only three compounds for next year - soft, medium and hard.raymondu999 wrote:They'll get 4 sets on both days, of softs and mediums... I wonder how they'll get feedback for the supersofts and the hards though