Jersey Tom wrote:I can't wait to revive this dumb thread when the 2012 cars are unveiled
100% agree. As much as I love the RB5/6/7s, I still can't get on board with the pullrod evangelists. I can imagine Ferrari sticking with pushrod, just to prove some point by not copying other teams (although they have adopted a RB type radiator exit at some races this year), but rather lengthening the gearbox and pushrods more to get a more slender RB style bodywork cross-section ahead of the beam wing. Can Ferrari's pushrods get much longer? I have no idea, but is it really physically impossible to do this with a compression member? And you get to keep suspension members out of the area below the lower wishbone, ahead of the diffuser roof.
How about some compromise: Have the bellcranks mounted on long extension shafts, locate the bulky suspension components as far forward as possible, operate them remotely in a sense. I'm assuming issues would be the bellcrank extension shaft flexing, and adding inertia to the bellcrank.
Pullrod evangelists... Hmmm, funny thing, that reminds me of some controversies we've had in the states recently.