Yes it's normal to wave the greens after the incident being cleared.RZS10 wrote:Well it was the first green after the scene of the accident, isn't that normal?
Yes it's normal to wave the greens after the incident being cleared.RZS10 wrote:Well it was the first green after the scene of the accident, isn't that normal?
It was poor visibility, even Sutil said that. Possibly he didn't saw double yellows or he entered too fast in zone with double yellows. There was surely need for a safety car when machinery is going out and the track is wet. There is no excuse for thatringo wrote:Slowing down suffiently at double yellows is the solution. These guys are paid big bucks, they know it's a high risk job and so they need to be fully responsible for their own safety. There's only so much that the fia can do. I think the measures in place are sufficient apart from looking into more detail thr deployment of tge tractor, everything else should rest on the driver when it comes to safe conduct on track and duting yellow flags.
It would've been due to the pressurisation in the helicopter and the swelling and pressure on the brain.adrianjordan wrote:The only one that springs to my mind is a serious one I'm afraid. They won't normally airlift a patient who needs, or might need, to be ventilated as, depending in the model of helicopter used, that's not possible due to space.e30ernest wrote:From Sky Sports F1:What kind of medical reason would prevent an airlift? Shouldn't that still be a better option since it will get Bianchi to the hospital sooner?Medical helicopter could fly and did take off to check conditions. BIANCHI was taken by a road ambulance due to MEDICAL reasons, not due to visibility or weather conditions.
Alternatively it could be that he actually wasn't deemed serious enough to need a helicopter. You can be unconscious without it being life-threatening and so it was decided to take him by road...
I suppose there could also have been concerns about weather at the receiving hospital due to high winds...
For the record I'm a first year student Paramedic, so whilst I have some knowledge in this area, I could just as easily be completely wrong...
You realise in the comm box they only have a tiny monitor not a 60" plasma. It was impossible to see what was happening behind the tractor and only once did a BIA graphic appear briefly at the incident, easily missed if you're also looking out the window and on other monitors trying to follow the chaos.ChrisM40 wrote:Just seen the BBC coverage, totally clueless about the Bianchi accident.
Gary Hartstein ruled that out as a reason not to fly. Helis do not fly high enough to make a difference.mekanikal_grip wrote:
It would've been due to the pressurisation in the helicopter and the swelling and pressure on the brain.
Think of what happens to a bottle of water when your on an aeroplane after take off, it expands and to a small degree your body does the same.
Fingers crossed the poor guy pulls through
Sky F1 got it pretty quickly.Shakeman wrote:You realise in the comm box they only have a tiny monitor not a 60" plasma. It was impossible to see what was happening behind the tractor and only once did a BIA graphic appear briefly at the incident, easily missed if you're also looking out the window and on other monitors trying to follow the chaos.ChrisM40 wrote:Just seen the BBC coverage, totally clueless about the Bianchi accident.
The main broadcast feed missed the Bianchi crash otherwise the replay would've easily shown them what was happening, the BBC comm box were as clueless as everyone else.
It's normal to wave the greens on the exit of the yellow zone.Shakeman wrote:Yes it's normal to wave the greens after the incident being cleared.RZS10 wrote:Well it was the first green after the scene of the accident, isn't that normal?
The ambulance was choosen as there is to much presure difference in a helicopter. For severe head injuries an ambulance is much better. Also the hospital was only a 10 minute drive from the circuit.Faustino wrote: Why would they choose to take a 40+ minute trip to Hospital by road when a helicopter would have had him there in less than half that time?? All vital minutes and seconds
Gary Hartstein former F1 doc ruled out pressure being the reason not to fly.deterherligt wrote:The ambulance was choosen as there is to much presure difference in a helicopter. For severe head injuries an ambulance is much better. Also the hospital was only a 10 minute drive from the circuit.Faustino wrote: Why would they choose to take a 40+ minute trip to Hospital by road when a helicopter would have had him there in less than half that time?? All vital minutes and seconds
Can we maybe move all this bianchi talk to a new thread? Today was a great race overshadowed by a freak accident. The accident needs its own thread.
The doc at the accident scene probably took the decision based on info at hand.Shakeman wrote:Gary Hartstein former F1 doc ruled out pressure being the reason not to fly.deterherligt wrote:The ambulance was choosen as there is to much presure difference in a helicopter. For severe head injuries an ambulance is much better. Also the hospital was only a 10 minute drive from the circuit.Faustino wrote: Why would they choose to take a 40+ minute trip to Hospital by road when a helicopter would have had him there in less than half that time?? All vital minutes and seconds
Can we maybe move all this bianchi talk to a new thread? Today was a great race overshadowed by a freak accident. The accident needs its own thread.
It would've been due to the pressurisation in the helicopter and the swelling and pressure on the brain.mekanikal_grip wrote:The only one that springs to my mind is a serious one I'm afraid. They won't normally airlift a patient who needs, or might need, to be ventilated as, depending in the model of helicopter used, that's not possible due to space.adrianjordan wrote: What kind of medical reason would prevent an airlift? Shouldn't that still be a better option since it will get Bianchi to the hospital sooner?
Alternatively it could be that he actually wasn't deemed serious enough to need a helicopter. You can be unconscious without it being life-threatening and so it was decided to take him by road...
I suppose there could also have been concerns about weather at the receiving hospital due to high winds...
For the record I'm a first year student Paramedic, so whilst I have some knowledge in this area, I could just as easily be completely wrong...
The typhoon was first spoken of on Monday, by Thursday it was a near certainty that it would affect the race on Sunday, by Friday people were openly asking if the race would be moved to Saturday or 11am Sunday morning. Honda had plenty of time to move the race, inform the fans and honour the Sunday tickets for a 11am Sunday start. Suzuka usually has a strong three day attendance and many tickets are Sat&Sun tickets so many of the race day ticket holders would have had Saturday tickets already. The fans also have to leave the circuit and get safely home so I'm sure they would not have minded moving the start time/day. (I realise that sounds more abrupt than intended, sorry)langwadt wrote:With the rain at the start they would have had to start much earlier. Telling tens of thousands spectators that you'll start the race a couple of hours early knowing they have train ticket that won't let them get to the track to see the races is a tough call.astracrazy wrote:Why was the fia being bullied by honda over this race anyway. Some drivers wanted to start ealier and twice the fia asked honda and they said no. The fia obviously felt it was a valid argument. They should of been a lot stronger and give honda the option start earlier or not at all. Weak.
And what, the train company would just have to all them to move their tickets as well - perhaps requiring extra trains to be put on...the impression I got from the BBC coverage was that the ability of people to get TO the circuit was a large part of the consideration.Gaz. wrote:The typhoon was first spoken of on Monday, by Thursday it was a near certainty that it would affect the race on Sunday, by Friday people were openly asking if the race would be moved to Saturday or 11am Sunday morning. Honda had plenty of time to move the race, inform the fans and honour the Sunday tickets for a 11am Sunday start. Suzuka usually has a strong three day attendance and many tickets are Sat&Sun tickets so many of the race day ticket holders would have had Saturday tickets already. The fans also have to leave the circuit and get safely home so I'm sure they would not have minded moving the start time/day. (I realise that sounds more abrupt than intended, sorry)langwadt wrote:
With the rain at the start they would have had to start much earlier. Telling tens of thousands spectators that you'll start the race a couple of hours early knowing they have train ticket that won't let them get to the track to see the races is a tough call.